The recent amendment to Article 248 of the El Salvador Constitution has drawn considerable criticism from international human rights organizations. Among those expressing concern is Amnesty International, which has warned that the changes could severely undermine the protection of human rights in the country. Ana Piquer, Director of Amnesty International Americas, highlighted the potential risks associated with the amendment, suggesting it could limit civic participation and centralize governmental power.
Historically, constitutional changes in El Salvador required approval across two consecutive legislative sessions, a process intended to provide sufficient time for public debate and diverse input. However, the amendment, ratified on January 29, 2025, now allows a single legislative body to enact constitutional changes with a three-quarters majority, potentially expediting the ratification process and reducing opportunities for comprehensive public scrutiny.
Critics worry that this expedited procedure could pave the way for future amendments that might weaken judicial independence and dilute human rights protections. The current supermajority held by the ruling party in the Legislative Assembly increases concerns about their ability to implement significant legal changes with minimal public consultation.
Human Rights Watch and other political analysts have echoed these worries, reinforcing calls for a return to a more participative constitutional reform process. The amendment comes amid broader concerns over El Salvador’s commitment to human rights practices, especially during states of emergency that have further restricted public freedoms and access to justice.
For more details on the ongoing situation, you can read the original article on JURIST.