India has expressed strong displeasure with UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Turk following his comments on the situation in Kashmir and Manipur. Labeling Turk’s observations on violence and alleged restrictions on journalists and activists in these regions as “unfounded and baseless,” India has refuted the claims during the 58th session of the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva (ANI News).
India’s Permanent Representative to the UN, Arindam Bagchi, argued that these remarks fail to acknowledge India’s democratic culture and the country’s resilience. Bagchi criticized the UN human rights office for being selective in its focus while overlooking India’s progress. Specifically, he highlighted Jammu and Kashmir’s record voter turnout, growing tourism, and economic advancements as evidence of the region’s stability since its reorganization (The Tribune India).
Bagchi also addressed concerns regarding Manipur, where the Indian government asserts it has taken substantive measures to restore normalcy following recent unrest. He called Turk’s concerns “oversimplifications” (The Print), arguing that they do not reflect the reality of the constitutional protections in place for all communities in India.
Further, New Delhi criticized the UN’s update for its selective coverage of global issues, noting the contentious omission of alleged human rights violations in Pakistan (India Today). India’s appeal to the UN called for introspection regarding its approach to India’s internal matters, citing the country’s vibrant democracy as evidence of its commitment to human rights.
The discussion of human rights within India is not a new narrative, as various organizations have previously urged the Indian government to address these issues. For instance, in February 2025, Amnesty International called for Indian authorities to resolve ongoing ethnic tensions in Manipur and ensure human rights protections (JURIST).
For further details, you can refer to the article originally published on JURIST.