As trade tensions between the United States and Canada escalate, dual degree law students from the University of Windsor and University of Detroit Mercy find themselves directly affected by the implications of these policy changes. Recent tariffs imposed by President Trump—25% on most Canadian goods and 10% on energy products—have placed these students, who traverse the Windsor-Detroit border frequently for their studies, in a challenging position.
With Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau announcing retaliatory measures against the U.S., which include imposing 25% on $155 billion of American goods, the financial and logistical implications for these students are immediate. For many, like Valavan Patkunaranjan, a 1L student in the program, the costs associated with such frequent cross-border travel, which include toll fees and potential increases in gas and car maintenance costs, are already a burden. Patkunaranjan explained that these attached expenses could escalate in light of the trade dispute, making daily commutes and student life more strenuous.
Paige Donaldson, a 2L in the Dual JD program, highlights concerns beyond just the everyday expenses, noting the broader professional implications for Canadian students who may pursue employment opportunities in the U.S. Post-graduate employment could be impacted by these tariffs, as increased trade restrictions may lead American companies to reduce hiring and sponsorship of Canadian graduates.
The justification used by the U.S. government, citing national security concerns linked to drug trafficking, is under scrutiny. Notably, legal experts, such as Professor Gus Van Harten of Osgoode Hall Law School, argue these tariffs may breach both USMCA and WTO agreements, as noted in The Logic.
The unique structure of the Dual JD program makes students particularly vulnerable to these trade disruptions. Furthermore, currency exchange fluctuations, where tuition and other expenses are often settled in U.S. dollars, add an extra layer of financial pressure on Canadian students. As these future international lawyers navigate the complexities of their studies amidst real-world trade tensions, they embody the direct personal impact such policies can have beyond simply economic indicators.
Whether these students will be able to leverage their unique bi-national education to bridge gaps created by these disputes remains to be seen. As events unfold, one thing remains certain: these students find themselves more than just observers of international trade law—they are living it.
For further insight into how these policy changes are affecting law students, read the full coverage on JURIST.