The Peruvian government’s Extinction of Domain office in Ayacucho has emerged as a leader in asset confiscations, driven by the nation’s contentious asset forfeiture legislation. Recently, the public prosecutor announced that the office, operating between 2019 and 2024, issued 255 rulings, leading to the seizure of approximately 3,943,235 soles, or $1,074,427, in assets and cash linked to illegal activities.
Peru’s Extinction of Domain Law allows the state to confiscate assets obtained unlawfully, such as real estate, vehicles, and money, even without a criminal conviction. However, in December, legislators put forward a bill that would necessitate a final ruling before initiating asset seizure, a move that specialized prosecutors in Ayacucho have cautioned could hinder effective forfeiture.
The law has been met with strong opposition from legal experts. Some have criticized it as a significant breach of constitutional rights. Former congressman Enrique Ghersi noted the potential pitfalls of the law’s broad application, warning against overly inclusive targeting that fails to consider Peru’s predominantly informal economy.
Supreme Judge Manuel Luján Túppez expressed concerns that over five thousand cases might be jeopardized if legislative amendments proceed. While his perspective highlights potential law enforcement challenges, the broader social implication remains a subject of ongoing debate.
The legal contestation isn’t limited to the legislative sphere; the Constitutional Court has admitted challenges to the law, prompted by arguments from legal professionals. The impending decisions—legislative and judicial—could reshape the future application of asset forfeiture in Peru.
For more information, see the original report.