The Supreme Court is set to engage with a critical legal matter this morning, as it hears arguments in a dispute involving the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) and the Palestinian Authority. The case centers on whether Americans who are victims of terror attacks abroad, or the families of those killed in such attacks, can pursue legal action against these entities within U.S. courts. Legal professionals following the proceedings can listen live.
This dispute adds another layer to the complex landscape of international law and the extent of U.S. jurisdiction. Arguments in this case could reshape the interpretation of legal rights for American victims of terrorism under the Anti-Terrorism Act. For further details on the court’s schedule, see this discussion.
In addition to the high-profile case, the Tuesday morning read provides a curated selection of Supreme Court-related news. Critical insights come from several distinguished journalists and publications:
- The Washington Post’s take on GOP lawmakers’ critique of anti-Trump rulings, available in an article by Justin Jouvenal, Theodoric Meyer, Marianna Sotomayor, and Clara Ence Morse.
- Analysis by Adam Liptak in The New York Times, suggesting the Supreme Court’s favorable stance on a Catholic charity’s position in a tax-related case.
- A piece by Nina Totenberg from NPR, which examines the Supreme Court’s inclination to exempt religious groups from unemployment compensation laws.
- Coverage by Maureen Groppe in USA Today about the Republican pursuit to defund Planned Parenthood with the Supreme Court’s involvement.
- Commentaries on Justices Sotomayor and Jackson’s critique of the court’s hesitance to clarify criminal appeal rights, as reported by Jordan Rubin for MSNBC.
For professionals keenly observing the term, it is notable that the court may issue one or more opinions on Wednesday, April 2. SCOTUSblog promises real-time coverage beginning at 9:45 a.m. EDT. For a broader range of readings, visit the SCOTUSblog article.