Western Digital recently presented arguments to a California federal judge, urging him to reconsider a tentative ruling supporting a jury’s decision to award $316 million in favor of SPEX Technologies Inc. This award, related to the infringement of a data security patent, has increased to a total of $553 million including interest. Western Digital contends…
American songwriter Jake Holmes has initiated legal proceedings against Led Zeppelin guitarist Jimmy Page and Warner Chappell Music Inc. in a California federal court. The lawsuit alleges that Page infringed on Holmes’s rights to the famous song “Dazed and Confused.” This follows a 2011 settlement in which it was acknowledged that Holmes was the original…
The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals is poised to make a decision regarding the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) classification of a competing narcolepsy treatment. The issue at hand is whether the FDA erred in its determination that the drug in question should not be considered the “same drug” as a treatment offered by…
The judicial landscape concerning forum selection clauses has seemingly undergone a significant shift, following a controversial decision by the Seventh Circuit. Corporate heavyweight Honeywell has raised the alarm, claiming that the Seventh Circuit has departed from the prevailing consensus among its peer circuits. This shift, described as a “lopsided divide,” suggests that the Seventh Circuit…
The State Bar of California has initiated legal action against the vendor responsible for proctoring the February bar exam, citing widespread technical failures that led to significant disruption. According to the claims, the vendor allegedly misrepresented its capabilities to effectively manage the exam process. Furthermore, there is a contention that the vendor is unwilling to…
A California lawyer from Orange County received a 21-month prison sentence for defrauding investors out of $8.8 million. This sentence was handed down by a federal court in California. The attorney falsely claimed to be providing short-term, high-interest loans to affluent individuals but instead diverted the funds for gambling at Las Vegas casinos and maintaining…
Human Rights Watch (HRW) has called for stronger protection of Indigenous rights in Malaysia’s Sarawak state following a logging incident that allegedly violated the rights of the Indigenous Iban community. According to a report issued by HRW, a local company logged timber without obtaining the free, prior, and informed consent (FPIC) of the Indigenous community,…
The United Nations has drawn attention to the plight of political detainees in Belarus, particularly those with disabilities. On Monday, independent human rights experts called for the immediate release of individuals with disabilities and serious health issues who have been detained in connection with the 2020 presidential elections. The Office of the United Nations High…
The U.S. Department of Justice has filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit initiated by the American Bar Association regarding the cessation of grants previously allocated to the ABA’s Commission on Domestic and Sexual Violence. The DOJ contends that the judiciary lacks the authority to compel the federal government to uphold what is positioned as…
In the realm of defamation litigation, significant cases continue to capture the attention of legal professionals. This month’s overview highlights critical updates in the ongoing defamation disputes involving prominent figures and entities. Notably, the focus remains on legal actions against media organizations accused of perpetuating claims related to election integrity. Two voting technology companies have…
Susman Godfrey LLP has made a compelling argument to a D.C. federal judge, asserting that the president lacks the authority to punish a law firm for the clients and causes it chooses to represent. This request comes after the judge was reminded of a case where Perkins Coie LLP was granted permanent relief from a…
Morgan & Morgan is urging a Georgia federal court to direct a former client’s malpractice class claims into arbitration. The law firm argues that the court should dismiss the client’s request to transfer the case to state court, emphasizing that the client had previously agreed to resolve such disputes through arbitration. This procedural move highlights…
In a recent legal decision, a D.C. federal court has sided with Liquidia Technologies Inc., affirming a U.S. Food and Drug Administration decision that enables the company to modify its new drug application. This modification allows for the inclusion of an additional indication for a lung disease drug that competes with United Therapeutics Corp.’s widely…
The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals recently affirmed a lower court’s ruling in favor of Boehringer Ingelheim’s veterinary division, concluding that it and other firms were not in violation of InfoDeli’s software copyrights. The court opined that certain elements within the online platforms developed by InfoDeli did not qualify for copyright protection. This decision underscores…
In the ongoing trademark dispute involving Kong Co., a Colorado federal judge has denied the company’s request to revisit a previous ruling that permits the introduction of an additional expert witness in the case. Kong Co., the animal toy manufacturer, is engaged in litigation with former collaborators over allegations of trademark infringement, which it claims…
Long Island state court judge Joseph Nocella Jr. has been sworn in as the interim U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of New York. This role, which he assumed on a recent Monday, will be held for a period of 120 days or until the Senate confirms his nomination, following a decision by President Donald…
The California State Bar has initiated legal proceedings against ProctorU Inc., following a system collapse during the February Bar Exam. The suit seeks damages and a court-mandated audit due to allegations that the vendor, operating as Meazure Learning, failed to provide crucial information about the malfunctioning incident. On the day before state lawmakers were scheduled…
Watson Farley & Williams is strategically enhancing its footprint in Asia by bolstering its energy practice. The firm has recently hired a trio of partners from DLA Piper in Hong Kong, a move that follows the recruitment of energy experts Clarinda Tjia-Dharmadi and Merrick White from McDermott Will & Emery’s former Singapore office. Notably, the…
In a legal development involving Traxcell Technologies, Inc., a bankrupt patent-holding company and Verizon Wireless, Traxcell has presented an argument before the Federal Circuit. The central issue is the timing of Verizon’s request for over $500,000 in attorney fees, which Traxcell claims was delayed beyond an acceptable period following the conclusion of a telecommunications patent…
In a significant development, patent board judges have decided to annul all the claims in a patent related to a method for treating sleep apnea. This decision arose from a challenge by a San Diego-based sleep apnea company. The company contends that these claims constitute “97 percent” of a pending patent case concerning sleep apnea…
The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s head for artificial intelligence is set to leave the agency, marking the latest personnel change at the organization renowned for overseeing intellectual property rights in the United States. This information comes from a report that outlines the impending departure of the key official who has been instrumental in addressing…
In a significant decision for whistleblower protections, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has been ordered to pay more than $125,000 to a judge from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). The judge faced retaliation after speaking out about misconduct within the organization, according to a recent ruling by the Merit Systems Protection…
The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has been ordered to pay over $125,000 in compensation to a judge from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). This order comes as a result of a ruling by the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB), which found that the judge experienced retaliation for blowing the whistle on…
In a recent legal development, a software solutions company has filed a lawsuit against Allstate Insurance Co. and StanCorp Financial Group Inc. The complaint, lodged in a California federal court, alleges that the insurance companies engaged in copyright infringement and breached a contractual agreement. The lawsuit claims that Allstate unlawfully distributed and reproduced the software…
The recent ruling involving Perkins Coie is capturing attention for its potential influence on future executive order litigations. Judge Howell’s ruling, although in the early stages of broader litigation, has instilled optimism among legal observers. They suggest that this decision could pave the way for favorable outcomes in similar cases for prominent law firms such…