The recent decision by Jordanian authorities to impose a ban on 12 online news outlets has drawn criticism from international press organizations and highlighted ongoing concerns about media freedom in the region. The Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) has urged the reversal of the ban, which the Jordanian Media Commission imposed after reports surfaced alleging that the government profited from humanitarian aid deliveries to Gaza.
Sara Qudah, CPJ’s Middle East and North Africa Program Director, stated that these measures indicate a concerning trend for press freedom in Jordan and called for the preservation of independent journalism to ensure transparency and informed public discourse. This ban, described by the CPJ as deeply alarming, targets several independent and foreign-based platforms, including Middle East Eye and Voice of Jordan. The Media Commission’s head, Bashir Al Momani, justified the ban by accusing the outlets of spreading false news with political motives and lacking proper accreditation.
This action follows a report by Middle East Eye that charged the Jordanian armed forces with receiving payments of up to $400,000 per aid airdrop to Gaza, channeled through the Jordan Hashemite Charity Organization. The military allegedly used these funds for logistical support. However, the Jordanian government has denied these allegations, claiming the reports are attempts to tarnish its image.
Critics of the ban argue that it is part of a wider campaign against press freedom, exacerbated by Jordan’s recently revised cybercrime law. Amnesty International has expressed concern over the law, labeling its vague provisions and stringent penalties as violations of international human rights standards. The law, which targets online content seen as provocative or false, has led to multiple arrests, including those who have voiced pro-Palestinian sentiments or criticized the government’s stance on Israel.
Amidst this backdrop, the CPJ warns that Jordan’s increasingly suppressive climate towards critical journalism and online dissent could pose a significant threat to public accountability. The organization stresses that upholding independent journalism is crucial for a transparent and informed society.