Generative AI’s burgeoning entry into legal practice has had a complex impact on attorneys like Cathy Cowin. A solo practitioner in Fresno, California, Cowin has successfully adapted to using AI tools despite her initial hesitance due to their uncontrolled growth in the legal domain. Her evolving approach is discussed in detail in a law.com video podcast, where she explores how AI informs her professional practice.
Training in computer systems long before becoming a lawyer gave Cowin firsthand insight into AI’s potential and pitfalls. Yet, when LexisNexis introduced the law-specific Lexis+ AI Protege, Cowin decided to integrate the technology into her practice. She emphasizes that this decision, though initially cautious, now feels non-negotiable due to the tool’s efficiency in managing complex client inquiries.
In the vodcast, Cowin recounts occasions where AI turned voluminous documents into concise answers in mere minutes, enhancing her ability to handle cases outside her comfort zone effectively. While AI occasionally suggests irrelevant case law, Cowin experiences it as more beneficial than misleading, treating it as an “associate” whose work still demands oversight.
Her strategy for ensuring accuracy involves critically viewing AI’s outputs through the lens of opposing counsel. Despite its intricacies, Cowin claims AI improves her research and analytical capabilities, bolstering her confidence in navigating unfamiliar legal terrains.