The U.S. Department of Education (DOE) recently declared that New York State’s ban on Native American school mascots violates federal civil rights law. This determination follows a DOE investigation into the state’s mascot prohibitions, which were implemented after the DOE initiated an inquiry in response to a complaint from The Native American Guardians Association (NAGA). NAGA alleged that the New York Department of Education (NYDOE) and the New York Board of Regents (BOR) unlawfully removed the “Chiefs” mascot from the Massapequa School District in violation of federal civil rights protections.
In 2023, the BOR approved a regulation, after unanimous voting, that bans the use of Indigenous team names, mascots, and logos in public schools (more details). The rule prohibits Indigenous symbols but permits mascots from other ethnic groups. Four Long Island school districts legally opposed this restriction, citing a breach of their First Amendment rights; however, their lawsuit was dismissed by a federal judge for insufficient evidence (case document).
The DOE’s Office of Civil Rights (OCR) has found that New York’s policy contravenes Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which bars discrimination in any federally assisted program based on race, color, or national origin. The current policy, according to the OCR, is discriminatory for targeting Native American representations while ignoring mascots linked to other ethnicities, such as “Dutchmen” or “Huguenots” (Title VI overview).
The Department’s investigation indicates significant non-compliance, prompting Secretary of Education Linda McMahon to call for immediate repeal of the offending regulation. The department also demands formal apologies to Indigenous tribes and may escalate the issue to the Department of Justice if New York does not amend its stance within ten days, risking state funding withdrawal.
These events unfold amid ongoing legal challenges surrounding the DOE, including a recent federal court decision in New Hampshire protecting DEI initiatives from funding withholdings and legal disputes over Department layoffs under the previous presidential administration (Executive Order 14242).
For more information, see the full article here.