Crowell & Moring LLP has announced its expansion into the Boston market through a combination with Faber Daeufer & Itrato PC. This move allows Crowell & Moring to establish an office in Boston and effectively tap into the robust life sciences community in the city. The collaboration is seen as a strategic step to enhance…
In a move designed to enhance its capabilities within the life sciences sector, Crowell & Moring has completed a merger with Boston-based firm Faber Daeufer & Itrato. This strategic acquisition aims to bolster Crowell’s life sciences and emerging companies portfolio, underscoring the firm’s ambition to expand its influence in this growing industry. The merger sees…
Crowell & Moring LLP has announced its expansion into the Boston market through a strategic combination with Faber Daeufer & Itrato PC. This partnership not only marks Crowell & Moring’s entry into Boston but also enhances its capabilities in the life sciences sector, leveraging Faber Daeufer’s established presence in the city. This move signifies a…
The Seventh Circuit Court has decided against reviewing its recent stance, which imposes unique restrictions on the use of mandamus in challenging forum selection decisions. Despite an 11-1 split warning from other jurisdictions, the court rejected calls to reconsider its approach to change-of-venue disputes. This decision may impact how litigants strategize on such matters within…
The U.S. Supreme Court recently chose not to address the ongoing debate surrounding the constitutionality of banning AR-15s and other semiautomatic rifles. This decision leaves unanswered questions about whether these firearms are safeguarded by the Second Amendment or whether states can impose bans considering their military-style features. The Court’s avoidance of this issue maintains the…
In a developing legal situation, two federal judges in Florida have mandated that a company specializing in disinfectant sprayers clarify the presence of artificial intelligence-generated fake citations and quotes in their legal filings. These filings are related to lawsuits concerning alleged corporate wrongdoing connected to a Canadian breach of contract case. The judiciary’s directive highlights…
The U.S. Supreme Court recently opted not to hear a race discrimination case involving a Black dancer, resulting in notable objections from Justices Ketanji Brown Jackson and Sonia Sotomayor. The Justices criticized the Fifth Circuit’s decision, labeling it as “patently erroneous.” The case involved questions regarding the timeliness of the discrimination suit filed by the…
In a significant ruling, a New York federal judge determined that Ethicon Inc., a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson, is liable for approximately $125 million to ChemImage Corp. This decision involves a termination fee of $40 million and intellectual property impairment damages estimated at $85 million. The dispute arose following Ethicon’s unilateral termination of their…
The Federal Circuit is currently evaluating whether an Ohio federal judge’s decision was correct in dismissing a $64 million jury verdict against Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. The case revolves around allegations that Goodyear appropriated an inventor’s concepts for self-inflating tires. The crux of the matter is whether the claimed trade secrets were adequately defined…
A California federal judge has decided to move forward with sentencing Tom Girardi, despite the unusual circumstances of his recent court appearance. Girardi, a disbarred attorney, appeared in a hearing where his pants fell down, leading to an unexpected spectacle. Nonetheless, the judge determined that Girardi is mentally competent to potentially serve prison time for…
Retired Washington Supreme Court Justice Charles K. Wiggins has passed away at the age of 77 from complications related to Parkinson’s disease. Justice Wiggins dedicated a decade of his career to serving on the state’s high court, significantly impacting the legal community during his tenure. His contributions to the judiciary leave a lasting legacy. For…
On June 2, 2025, Shockwave Medical Inc. faced scrutiny at the Federal Circuit as it argued a significant point regarding patent law. The company’s legal counsel contended that applicant-admitted prior art needs to be accompanied by expert testimony when presented to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). However, this perspective didn’t gain the expected…
A recent decision by a Texas federal jury has determined that Fortress Investment Group has control over VLSI Technology. This ruling is significant and could influence the ongoing patent dispute between VLSI Technology and Intel. The jury’s narrow finding is particularly important given the multibillion-dollar stakes involved in the litigation, which has been ongoing and…
Eminem’s music publisher has initiated legal proceedings against Meta Platforms Inc., accusing the company of “rampant” copyright infringement. In a suit filed with a federal court in Detroit, the publisher claims that Meta has been storing, distributing, and promoting the use of Eminem’s songs without obtaining the necessary licensing agreements. This development raises significant concerns…
In a recent ruling, a federal judge in Washington, D.C., affirmed that the previous order nullifying a Trump administration executive order targeting Jenner & Block LLP stands firm. The directive, which had sweeping implications, must now be entirely rolled back by the government, the judge clarified. This decision underscores the judicial branch’s role in maintaining…
Micron Technology Inc. is requesting that the U.S. Supreme Court intervene to prevent a Chinese semiconductor firm from obtaining paper copies of sensitive source code amidst ongoing patent infringement litigation. Micron argues that the lower court has overlooked significant national security concerns associated with the case. For more detailed information, you can access the article…
In a noteworthy development in the pharmaceutical patent landscape, a Delaware federal judge has permitted two manufacturers of generic bladder medication to argue that patents owned by Astellas Pharma Inc. are invalid due to obviousness. This decision lifts a previous stipulation that had restricted these generic drug manufacturers from making such a claim. The judge’s…
The ongoing debate on litigation funding transparency has taken a new turn with calls for stronger disclosure requirements in court proceedings. A recent Law360 article by Anup Misra of Curiam Capital raises concerns that such requirements could negatively impact patent holders. While the intent of these measures is to foster fairness and transparency, Misra argues…
The German software corporation SAP has petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to review a ruling from the Ninth Circuit, which revived tying claims made by its American competitor, Teradata. SAP argues that antitrust liability issues require heightened judicial scrutiny in the context of technologically integrated products. These claims, which involve controversial practices in which a…
Marc-André Blanchard, former Chair and CEO of McCarthy Tétrault, has been appointed as the new Chief of Staff to Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney. Blanchard’s extensive background includes global diplomatic experience and a strong legal expertise, factors that are expected to serve him well in this pivotal role within the government. His appointment follows the…
The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has announced a new head of enforcement, marking the second leadership change in this position within three months. The newly appointed official is the longtime deputy director who will now take the helm of the enforcement division. This decision may impact the CFTC’s approach to regulatory enforcement and…
In May, Massachusetts judges faced several notable cases with significant legal implications. One of the key rulings involved accusations of fraud concerning the sale of a struggling life sciences company. This case required judges to navigate complex legal arguments and evidence pertaining to contractual obligations and misrepresentation. Another significant decision granted leniency to a vendor…
In a recent legal development, a California federal judge has removed a cybersquatting claim from a trademark infringement case filed by a Texas-based software company against Perplexity AI Inc., headquartered in San Francisco. The court concluded that the artificial intelligence firm’s alleged offer to purchase the disputed trademark does not meet the criterion of “bad…
Pepperdine University is pressing a legal challenge against Netflix and Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. regarding the TV series “Running Point.” The university has asked a California federal court to refuse an effort by these companies to dismiss its trademark lawsuit. Pepperdine claims that the branding of the fictional basketball team within the series mirrors the…
More than 200 aspiring legal professionals who sat for the California Bar in February are set to see their results shift from “fail” to “pass” following the approval of new scoring adjustments by a California Bar committee. In a recent correspondence from the Bar, it was detailed that candidates who were close to passing and…