Recent findings from the AI in Legal Departments: 2025 Benchmarking Report, conducted by Counselwell and Spellbook, highlight an increase in artificial intelligence adoption among corporate legal departments. The survey, which involved 256 in-house legal professionals across North America, notably found that 38% of these departments are actively utilizing AI tools, while an additional 50% are exploring potential implementations. However, the report underscores ongoing challenges linked to trust, data privacy, and the effective measurement of AI impacts.
Among those departments that have integrated AI, contract-related tasks appear to be the most prevalent use case, as reported by 64% of the participants. Other frequent applications include legal research and document translation, with respective adoption rates of 49% and 38%. The survey also anticipates that usage will likely expand into operational areas, with 32% of respondents planning to adopt legal operations and workflow automation tools within the next couple of years.
The predominance of ChatGPT as a popular AI tool is evident, having been adopted by 74% of AI-using departments. Microsoft Copilot follows with 40%, and Spellbook is in use by 22% of these respondents. Despite high satisfaction levels—97% reported effectiveness to some degree—concerns persist. Trust in AI outputs remains a key challenge, referenced by 60% of respondents, while data privacy issues were highlighted by 57% of participants.
Measuring the return on investment (ROI) from AI tools poses another challenge. Though 83% recognize improved efficiency as a key benefit, only 7% have established KPIs for tracking AI’s value. The survey further identified that legal professionals anticipate job functions will evolve with AI’s assistance rather than replacement, with a significant portion expecting tasks to be automated, yet not entire roles.
Knowledge and understanding of AI among legal professionals also display gaps. While 59% claim some familiarity with AI tools, only a fraction—24%—express a robust understanding of AI fundamentals relevant to legal contexts. Additionally, organizational policies concerning AI are developing unevenly; only 48% have currently implemented AI guidelines.
The report offers a valuable insight into AI’s progression within legal departments, presenting an evolving landscape where initial adoption is encouraging, yet dependent on addressing critical issues of trust, training, and governance for widespread and effective use.
For further details, the complete article is available here.