In the ongoing criminal proceedings against Luigi Mangione, defense attorney Karen Friedman Agnifilo contends that the federal and state legal theories concerning her client are conflicting. This, she argues, implies a double jeopardy situation. However, the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office rebuffs this claim, asserting that these inconsistencies in legal theories undermine the defense’s argument for dismissing the state charges based on double jeopardy laws. The state case involves allegations of terrorism against a group, whereas the federal charge pertains to an individual stalking offense.