The regulation of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), often referred to as “forever chemicals,” is increasingly becoming a focal point for both federal and state governments in the United States. While the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) moves forward with plans to address PFAS contamination, several states are independently imposing stricter measures to limit these substances, anticipating potential federal regulatory rollbacks. This development requires businesses to closely monitor changes to stay compliant with state-specific legislation, which may impact their operations significantly.
The EPA’s strategy, as communicated by Administrator Lee Zeldin, aims to enhance regulatory infrastructure for addressing PFAS contamination. This plan involves appointing an agency lead for PFAS management and crafting effluent limitations and guidelines targeting manufacturers. Notably, the proposed initiatives anticipate collaboration with Congress and industry stakeholders. Stakeholders continue watching closely, especially regarding the regulation of PFAS in drinking water [link](https://content.govdelivery.com/accounts/USEPAAO/bulletins/3ddf152) (more information).
At the state level, legislative bodies are advancing their own measures to regulate PFAS independently. For instance, California’s A.B. 794, introduced in February, would allow the state to adhere to pre-2021 federal regulations, bolstering local authority over water quality standards. Similarly, Connecticut and Pennsylvania are moving bills targeting specific PFAS concentration limits, reflecting a growing trend of states asserting regulatory power over drinking water safety. Vermont’s legislative proposal also aims to eliminate several PFAS types from water supplies completely (more information).
Internationally, regulations are aligning with efforts in North America and Europe to address PFAS concerns. Canada is prioritizing PFAS reduction in firefighting foams as part of its phased approach, while the European Commission considers bans on consumer products containing PFAS. This outcome would affect industries using PFAS in production, requiring stringent monitoring of global regulatory environments (more information).
As jurisdictions globally enforce PFAS legislation, businesses must adapt to potentially conflicting regulations. Companies operating across multiple states or countries should assess their supply chain for PFAS use and explore insurance options that mitigate compliance risks. Legal and industry experts continue to advise monitoring these developments to protect business interests effectively (more information).