Judge Orders CFTC to Pay $3.1 Million in Lawyers’ Fees to My Forex Funds After Case Dismissal

In a significant legal development, U.S. District Judge Edward Kiel has ordered the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) to pay $3.1 million in attorney fees to Traders Global Group, known as My Forex Funds, following the dismissal of the agency’s lawsuit against the firm. The judge’s decision underscores the necessity for defendants to engage experienced legal counsel when facing substantial allegations from federal agencies.

Judge Kiel emphasized the appropriateness of the defendants’ choice in legal representation, stating, “Considering the complexity of the matter, the issues involved in the motion, and the challenges faced by defendants in defending against a federal agency’s serious allegations of $300 million in potential liability, defendants’ retention of highly experienced counsel at the hourly rates charged was a reasonable and necessary choice.” ([reuters.com](https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/judge-sanctions-cftc-over-agencys-conduct-my-forex-funds-case-2025-05-14/?utm_source=openai))

The CFTC had accused My Forex Funds and its CEO, Murtuza Kazmi, of fraudulently collecting over $310 million in fees and transferring C$31.5 million to a foreign account. However, it was later revealed that the CFTC had received an email from the Ontario Securities Commission confirming the legitimacy of the transfer as a tax payment, information that was not disclosed until months after the lawsuit was filed. ([reuters.com](https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/judge-sanctions-cftc-over-agencys-conduct-my-forex-funds-case-2025-05-14/?utm_source=openai))

In response to the court’s findings, Acting CFTC Chairman Caroline Pham acknowledged the agency’s misconduct, describing it as “inexcusable,” and emphasized the need for accountability to restore the CFTC’s credibility. ([reuters.com](https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/judge-sanctions-cftc-over-agencys-conduct-my-forex-funds-case-2025-05-14/?utm_source=openai))

This case highlights the critical importance of transparency and due diligence in regulatory enforcement actions, as well as the potential consequences of failing to disclose pertinent information during legal proceedings.