Amnesty International Demands Release of Detained LGBTQ+ Activist in Türkiye Amid Rising Concerns over Freedom of Expression

Amnesty International has denounced Türkiye’s arrest and detention of Enes Hocaoğulları, an LGBTQ+ activist, calling the move arbitrary and demanding his immediate release. Hocaoğulları faced legal action following his criticism of human rights violations during mass protests after Istanbul Mayor Ekrem İmamoğlu’s arrest. Amnesty International contends that his arrest violates his right to freedom of expression, urging for his unconditional release, emphasizing that peaceful expressions against human rights violations should not be criminalized, as highlighted in JURIST.

This call for action has found support from Oliver Ropke, President of the European Economic and Social Committee. He expressed concerns over the erosion of democratic principles in Türkiye, where restrictions on freedom of expression are increasingly prevalent. Ropke emphasized the importance of human rights activists and civil society in holding governments accountable, noting Türkiye’s obligations as a member of the Council of Europe and an EU candidate to maintain democratic standards.

Hocaoğulları’s arrest occurred at Ankara Esenboga Airport on August 5, triggered by a speech he delivered before the Council of Europe’s Congress of Local and Regional Authorities. The charges against him include “publicly disseminating misleading information” and “inciting the public to hatred and enmity,” carrying penalties of one to three years in prison. These charges, based on Articles 217/A and 216/1 of the Turkish penal code, have been criticized by Amnesty International for contradicting Türkiye’s commitments under international humanitarian law. The call is for the repeal of Article 217/A and the amendment of Article 216/1 to focus solely on advocacy inciting violence or discrimination.

The speech that led to Hocaoğulları’s charges, held on March 27 in Strasbourg, criticized the Turkish government’s heavy-handed response to protests following İmamoğlu’s arrest on charges of bribery and extortion. These protests highlighted the broader governance and human rights challenges that Türkiye faces, underscored by Amnesty’s documentation of the excessive use of force and other rights violations against peaceful protesters.

Further context about the situation highlights the precarious position of human rights in Türkiye, particularly concerning freedom of expression and police conduct during civil unrest. The case of Hocaoğulları serves as a pressing reminder of the challenges faced by activists who remain determined to advocate for democratic principles and human rights in increasingly hostile environments. As this situation unfolds, it underscores the international community’s role in promoting adherence to fundamental freedoms and the rule of law.