The Supreme Court has recently added four new cases to its docket for the 2025-26 term, addressing critical issues related to arbitration and jurisdiction. Among these, three particular cases stand out for their potential implications on arbitration and trial venues.
-
Jules v. Andre Balazs Properties: This case addresses an issue that has long been a point of contention in arbitration proceedings. It will examine whether a federal court that initially exercises jurisdiction and pauses a case for arbitration retains its jurisdiction over applications to confirm or vacate arbitration awards, even when it might not otherwise possess such jurisdiction.
-
T.M. v. University of Maryland Medical System Corporation: This case delves into the intricacies of the Rooker-Feldman doctrine. Specifically, it questions whether the doctrine, which typically prevents federal courts from reviewing state court decisions, also prohibits federal lawsuits challenging decisions still under state court review.
-
Abouammo v. United States: This case could significantly impact where criminal trials can be held. It will explore whether a venue is appropriate in a district where no underlying criminal conduct occurred, provided the legal provision in question considers potential effects in that district.
These cases are expected to be argued in March, with decisions anticipated between late June and early July 2026. For those interested in the broader scope of the Supreme Court’s forthcoming term, SCOTUSblog provides a comprehensive overview.