Supreme Court’s Year-End Deliberations: Guns, Climate, Immunity, Religion, Fines on the Docket

This week, the U.S. Supreme Court convenes for its final private conference of the year, focusing on several pivotal cases. Key petitions on the agenda address issues surrounding the Second Amendment, climate change, qualified immunity, religious accommodations, and excessive fines.

Firstly, the Second Amendment remains a central topic. Already, the court has proceedings regarding gun owners needing express permission to carry firearms on private properties accessible to the public. Further petitions examine the federal ban on firearms possession by nonviolent felons and the classification of high-capacity ammunition devices under the Second Amendment, to name a few.

In matters of climate change, Suncor Energy Inc. v. County Commissioners of Boulder County seeks to determine whether state laws can address interstate emissions. Boulder, Colorado’s action against Suncor Energy and Exxon Mobil for their fossil fuel activities spearheads this issue.

The court will also evaluate the intersection of qualified immunity and First Amendment rights in Villarreal v. Alaniz. This case revolves around a journalist who was allegedly arrested for violating reporting-related statutes, later contested under First Amendment claims.

Another significant issue pertains to religious accommodations in the context of vaccine mandates. The court will consider Kane v. City of New York, focusing on the balance between religious accommodation rights and public health regulations, specifically relating to COVID-19 mandates.

Finally, the case of Jouppi v. Alaska allows the court to deliberate on the application of the excessive fines clause. Here, the confiscation of a pilot’s plane, valued at $95,000, over a case involving alcohol transportation, stands at the center.

The court is expected to provide an order list on December 15, which may grant insights into which petitions have been accepted for further consideration during the upcoming term. More information on these cases can be found in the original SCOTUSblog article.