The trial of Tanzanian opposition leader Tundu Lissu took another turn as a court sustained his objection against the use of secret witnesses. This decision came after Lissu challenged the prosecution’s request to shield witness identities by having them testify from an enclosed cell. Lissu argued this contravened Rule Three of the Witness Protection Rules, which emphasizes transparency in court by allowing the observation of witnesses.
The presiding judge, Dunstan Ndunguru, ruled in favor of Lissu’s objection, highlighting that the proposed secrecy compromised judicial integrity by obscuring the view of the witnesses. Lissu, who is representing himself, has been navigating a series of grievances throughout the trial. His case, marked by numerous delays, has drawn significant attention from human rights organizations. As reported by Human Rights Watch, the trial has faced multiple postponements since Lissu’s arrest for advocating constitutional reforms prior to the previous year’s contentious election.
That election, which saw President Samia Suluhu Hassan securing 97% of the vote, was marred by controversy after opposition candidates, including Lissu, found themselves barred for allegedly not adhering to electoral protocols. The situation sparked protests, which were met with a forceful government response. Amnesty International documented the government’s use of lethal force and internet shutdowns during this period.
Lissu continues to face challenges in his legal proceedings, citing limitations in accessing his legal representatives. Despite the court’s rejection of other objections he raised earlier in the week, the trial is expected to resume on Thursday. Details about the latest developments in Lissu’s trial can be found through the JURIST news update.