During oral argument in January on an Idaho law barring transgender athletes from competing in girls’ and women’s sports, Justice Sonia Sotomayor briefly reflected on the spotlight that comes with being involved in a Supreme Court case. She noted that having your name on a brief draws attention to you not only as a litigant but as a person. However, some parties before the court already have a spotlight on them. Among the petitions awaiting the justices’ attention this spring are at least four involving well-known petitioners, including sports figures, rappers, and celebrity magicians.
An NFL coach v. the NFL
A petition for review questions whether the NFL can grant its commissioner complete authority to determine if a coach’s claim against it is successful. This emanates from a racial discrimination lawsuit filed by former Miami Dolphins head coach Brian Flores against the NFL, among others. The 2nd Circuit affirmed Flores’ victory, rendering the NFL’s arbitration agreement unenforceable. In response, the NFL and its teams have asked the Supreme Court to review the case.
A former NBA star’s vaccine battle
Utah Jazz legend John Stockton, now a vocal critic of vaccine mandates, has joined a lawsuit against Washington state officials, arguing it violates free speech. The case, Stockton v. Brown, centers on the Washington Medical Commission’s actions against doctors spreading COVID-19 misinformation. The 9th Circuit affirmed a previous dismissal. Stockton and his co-plaintiffs have since appealed to the Supreme Court.
Hip-hop artists rally behind death row inmate
In Texas, death row inmate James Garfield Broadnax is gaining support from hip-hop artists, including Travis Scott and T.I., who have filed amicus briefs regarding the use of his rap lyrics during sentencing. The case, Broadnax v. Texas, questions whether the inclusion of Broadnax’s lyrics prejudiced his sentencing. The Supreme Court will consider his petition this term.
Star magicians on hypnosis
Charles Don Flores is backed by magicians Penn & Teller, who filed a brief about “investigative hypnosis” used in his conviction. Flores seeks a review of hypnosis used to identify him as the perpetrator in a murder case. His petition is under review, with the court to decide whether to hear the case later this term.
In summary, while celebrity involvement in Supreme Court cases draws attention, it remains to be seen how it affects the justices’ decisions. For more, visit SCOTUSblog.