Apple Inc. has made a significant move by appealing to the U.S. Supreme Court, seeking clarity on the issuance of civil contempt sanctions. The tech giant contends that the Ninth Circuit erred when it upheld such sanctions against Apple in the ongoing App Store dispute with Epic Games. This request for review underscores Apple’s broader…
In a significant legal victory for Exxon Mobil Corp., attorneys successfully defended the company against a securities class action lawsuit that had persisted for a decade. The litigation, initiated by investors who claimed Exxon misled them regarding the impact of climate change regulations on business projections, culminated in a trial in Texas federal court. The…
With the long weekend approaching, intellectual property attorneys might find some extra time to relax while staying informed. Podcasts serve as an ideal way to combine leisure with professional development. Here are five podcasts that can keep IP lawyers entertained and up-to-date. “Law360’s Pro Say” provides a weekly recap of the biggest stories from the…
In a strategic legal move, Tom Goldstein, among the most noted figures in the appellate community, has enlisted former Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar’s expertise as he faces a critical juncture in his criminal tax case. Goldstein, renowned for his oral advocacy, has sought Prelogar’s assistance to navigate the complexities surrounding his upcoming sentencing and anticipated…
President Donald Trump announced on Thursday the postponement of a planned executive order intended to enhance cybersecurity measures for emerging artificial intelligence models. This move comes amid concerns that requirements for developers to voluntarily share AI systems with the government for pre-release testing might hinder innovation. Trump’s decision highlights a critical tension between security measures…
In a strategic legal shift, Prime Therapeutics LLC, a prominent pharmacy benefit manager, has engaged new legal representation in an ongoing antitrust litigation. The company has replaced its previous counsel, Cravath Swaine & Moore LLP, with the firms WilmerHale and another partner in response to a lawsuit filed by the Michigan Attorney General. The suit…
In a developing legal dispute surrounding the “Let’s Go Brandon” cryptocurrency, investors have urged a Florida federal court to dismiss a sanctions bid made by the coin’s founder. The core of the controversy lies in an alleged breach of the safe harbor rule, which mandates that a draft motion must be sent 21 days prior…
UCB Inc. recently secured a significant legal victory after a Delaware federal judge confirmed the validity of patents covering its seizure medication, Nayzilam. This decision effectively wards off competition from generic-drug manufacturer Cipla Ltd., which had admitted to infringing those patents. The aftermath of this ruling allows UCB to maintain its competitive edge in the…
Recently, the federal government expressed its stance regarding a trademark dispute between PepsiCo and Rise Brewing Co., a maker of nitro cold-brew coffee. Despite acknowledging that the Second Circuit made errors in its analysis, the government advised the U.S. Supreme Court to abstain from reviewing the case. This unusual recommendation arises from considerations over the…
In a recent decision, a New Jersey federal judge permitted a lawsuit against former Major League Baseball star Harold Reynolds to proceed, despite not compelling the case into arbitration. The suit, brought by a technology company, centers around allegations that Reynolds breached an agreement to develop a youth sports app. This decision reflects a growing…
As intellectual property attorneys juggle multiple cases and complex legal frameworks, staying informed about the latest trends and developments is crucial. For those looking to combine learning with leisure, a range of podcasts can offer both education and entertainment. Here are five podcasts that stand out for IP professionals. IP Fridays provides insights into both…
The recent decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Enviro Tech Chemical Services Inc. v. Safe Foods Corp. has sparked significant interest in the legal community due to its implications for patent language, particularly concerning approximation terms like ‘about’. This ruling highlights the critical role such language plays not only…
As the legal world grows increasingly complex and high-pressure, innovative methods of managing stress and maintaining focus are becoming crucial to success. An unexpected but effective partner in this endeavor is the therapy dog. These four-legged companions are proving invaluable in courtrooms and law offices, lending a calming presence that helps legal professionals navigate the…
The Board of Governors of the Washington State Bar Association (WSBA) has taken a significant step by amending its admission policies to allow graduates of non-ABA-accredited law schools to sit for the bar exam. Effective May 1, 2026, this policy change aims to broaden the pathway for law graduates seeking to enter the legal profession…
An Indiana federal judge has ruled that an insurer is not obligated to provide coverage in a case involving an arcade accused of trademark infringement. The decision hinges on two critical points: the exclusion of trademark liability in the insurance policy and the fact that the alleged infringement commenced before the policy period. Details of…
The recent insider trading case involving pilfered information from BigLaw firms has reinvigorated Boston’s position as a hub for white-collar crime enforcement. This development underscores a shift for federal prosecutors in the region, returning them to the core activities of tackling financial misconduct. The case is seen as a much-needed boost for the Boston office,…
Justice Barbara A. Lenk, the pioneering figure who became the first openly gay member of the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, has passed away at the age of 75. Her death was announced by state court officials, closing a significant chapter in the state’s legal history. Appointed to the court in 2011, Justice Lenk’s impact extended…
Piper Networks, a provider of innovative train service solutions, has hit a significant legal hurdle. A federal court in New York has decided that Piper Networks cannot exit an ongoing infringement lawsuit initiated by Metrom Rail LLC. This suit revolves around alleged breaches of Metrom Rail’s train safety patents. The decision came after the court…
AT&T has initiated legal action against California, challenging the state’s mandate that obligates the telecommunications giant to continue offering landline services to all prospective customers within its wireline network area. This move comes as AT&T seeks a Federal Communications Commission (FCC) declaration to prevent California from enforcing these rules, aiming to discontinue services for around…
A Minnesota jury has delivered a $10.2 million verdict in favor of a man and his wife, confirming his claim that a lifetime of using talcum powder products resulted in his cancer diagnosis. The 43-year-old plaintiff argued that his illness was linked to asbestos-contaminated talc, a claim that has seen increasing attention in recent years…
A Delaware state jury recently found in favor of C3.ai, an artificial intelligence software developer, awarding the company $23.3 million in damages after it accused engine manufacturer Cummins Inc. of trade secret misappropriation. This legal dispute highlights the intensified scrutiny over intellectual property rights amid the burgeoning landscape of AI development. C3.ai’s allegations centered on…
The recent indictment of Sinaloa Governor Rubén Rocha Moya and nine other current and former Mexican officials by the U.S. Department of Justice has sent shockwaves through Mexico’s political and business communities. The officials are accused of conspiring with the Sinaloa Cartel to import large quantities of narcotics into the United States in exchange for…
In a significant development for patent litigation watchers, the Federal Circuit has endorsed a recent decision by the Patent Trial and Review Board (PTAB) regarding a patent dispute involving Intuit Inc. and Samesurf Inc. The decision affirms the PTAB’s earlier conclusion that a patent held by Samesurf, which had been leveraged against Intuit’s TurboTax, is…
The United States Department of Justice recently decided to dismiss charges against four individuals involved in protests against the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) in the Chicago area. These charges, which were initially brought about due to demonstrations at immigration detention facilities, have been a focal point in the ongoing national debate about immigration…
In a recent panel discussion, several current and former immigration judges expressed concerns over what they perceive as increasing threats to their judicial independence. These panelists highlighted a range of systemic issues, with particular emphasis on the burgeoning backlog of cases compounded by the departure of numerous judges from the bench. This situation has sparked…