Supreme Court Backs SEC’s Disgorgement Power, Strengthening Fraud Deterrence

The U.S. Supreme Court’s recent unanimous decision in Sripetch v. Securities and Exchange Commission has reaffirmed the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) authority to seek disgorgement of ill-gotten gains without the necessity of proving direct investor losses. This ruling resolves a significant circuit split and clarifies the SEC’s enforcement capabilities.

In the case, Ongkaruck Sripetch was convicted for selling unregistered high-risk penny stocks, resulting in a 21-month prison sentence and an order to repay over $3 million. Sripetch contested the disgorgement, arguing that the SEC failed to demonstrate that investors suffered financial harm. The Supreme Court, however, determined that it suffices to show that the defendant profited from illegal activities, and that these profits can be returned to defrauded investors when feasible.

This decision overturns the Second Circuit’s 2023 ruling in SEC v. Govil, which had imposed stricter requirements on the SEC by mandating proof of investor pecuniary harm to justify disgorgement. The Supreme Court’s ruling aligns with the First and Ninth Circuits, which had previously held that such proof was unnecessary.

Legal experts note that while the decision strengthens the SEC’s enforcement tools, it also underscores the importance of ensuring that disgorged funds are returned to victims whenever possible. The Court emphasized that disgorgement must be awarded for victims and should not exceed the net profits from the wrongdoing.

For corporate legal professionals, this ruling highlights the necessity of robust compliance programs to prevent securities violations. The SEC’s reaffirmed authority to seek disgorgement without proving investor losses means that companies and individuals involved in securities fraud face significant financial repercussions, even in the absence of direct investor harm.

In summary, the Supreme Court’s decision in Sripetch v. SEC clarifies the scope of the SEC’s disgorgement authority, allowing the agency to continue its efforts to deter securities fraud and protect investors by reclaiming ill-gotten gains from violators.