The security landscape for U.S. Supreme Court justices has evolved significantly in recent years. Notably, an incident involving Justice Amy Coney Barrett, who was the target of a “swatting” attempt, brings the enduring threats and enhanced security measures surrounding the justices to light. The swatting incident, characterized by false reports of violence to elicit a large police response, was quickly determined by local authorities to be a hoax, thanks to the 24-hour security detail at Barrett’s residence.
The level of protection for Supreme Court justices today is markedly different from years past. As recounted by Jay Willis, Justice David Souter’s absence from an important 2005 Supreme Court ceremony highlighted the minimal security presence during his tenure, contrasted starkly with today’s comprehensive protective measures.
The shift in security dynamics gained particular momentum following the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization decision leak in 2022, which rekindled public demonstrations and even threats against the justices, including an assassination attempt on Justice Brett Kavanaugh described in Justice Department reports.
Enhancing security has led not only to increased staffing and resource allocation but also to substantial budgetary growth. According to the FY2027 budget request, the Supreme Court is seeking over $207 million for discretionary salaries and expenses, a significant increase from earlier years. The Supreme Court Police Department, which currently staffs 233 officers as noted on their website, has seen similar growth, aiming to transition responsibilities from the U.S. Marshals Service. An increase in discretionary employee numbers and funding illustrates this pronounced trend.
This financial backing is largely supported across party lines. The bipartisan push seen in 2022, exemplified by Senators Mark Warner and Bill Hagerty’s legislative efforts, underscores the political consensus on the importance of securing appropriate protection for the justices. Their efforts culminated in legislation to bolster Supreme Court security funding, emphasizing that Congress is willing to provide the necessary resources.
A sustained focus on security efforts is evidenced by the Supreme Court’s hiring strategies, which include offering significant recruitment incentives. As further detailed in the USA Jobs listing, incentives reach up to $60,000 for certain positions, reflecting the urgency and importance placed on attracting quality personnel to meet these growing security needs.