In its latest round of decisions, the Supreme Court has declined to hear a series of cases that legal professionals and policymakers were closely watching. These cases encompassed key issues such as voting rights, environmental regulations, and intellectual property disputes. The court’s decisions were revealed in a list of orders from their June 18 conference, with their next meeting scheduled for June 25, before their summer recess begins.
Among the cases denied review, RMS of Georgia v. EPA addressed the Environmental Protection Agency’s rule on phasing down hydrofluorocarbons, substances commonly used in cooling appliances that are also potent greenhouse gases. Another significant case, Arkansas United v. Thurston, discussed who has the authority to enforce Section 208 of the Voting Rights Act. This section is designed to assist voters who need help due to blindness, disability, or illiteracy, especially in light of state laws that restrict assistance beyond election officials.
Intellectual property was another focal point, with the court choosing not to hear Game Plan v. Uninterrupted IP, which revolved around trademark rights to the phrase “More Than an Athlete,” involved with LeBron James’ media company.
Additionally, the court has sought the opinion of the U.S. solicitor general in certain cases, including Saadeh v. New Jersey State Bar Association, a dispute concerning the bar association’s selection of leadership roles and diversity, and Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America v. O’Day, which challenges an Oregon law mandating drug price disclosures.
Notably, several high-profile petitions are yet to be acted upon, including those challenging Arizona’s voting restrictions and laws in Washington State concerning minors’ mental health treatments. For more information, read the full article here.