In a significant development in the biotech sector, a Delaware federal judge has dismissed two of Harbour Medical’s mouse antibody patents in its infringement case against Amgen’s subsidiary, Immunex. The judge deemed the patents indefinite due to what was described as a term that “everyone agrees” is “nonsensical,” thus simplifying the impending trial for Amgen….
In a notable development within the realm of college athletics, two former college football stars who transitioned into the NFL have taken legal action against the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA), alongside Big Ten and Southeastern conferences. The athletes assert that these institutions engaged in anticompetitive practices by leveraging their talents without providing adequate compensation…
In a recent legal development, a federal judge in Washington declined to approve a trademark dispute settlement proposed by Eli Lilly concerning its weight management medication, raising concerns over the agreement’s expansive terms. The settlement involved allegations against two Seattle-area medical clinics accused of infringing on Eli Lilly’s trademarks. However, the proposed consent decree was…
In a significant development within California’s legal landscape, the State Bar of California has brought disciplinary charges against three more attorneys from a Los Angeles personal injury firm. This firm is currently under scrutiny due to its involvement in a record $4 billion sex abuse settlement against Los Angeles County. The allegations put forth by…
The Federal Circuit expressed reservations on Thursday regarding the possibility of overturning a lower court decision requiring Viavi Solutions Inc. to cover the attorney fees of a competitor it unsuccessfully sued for patent infringement. Viavi, a network testing company, faced criticism over its failed litigation, which led to this challenging position on appeal at the…
In a significant legal confrontation, attorneys representing plaintiffs in a California talc trial have implored a Los Angeles jury to impose punitive damages on Johnson & Johnson. This case, heard in the Los Angeles Superior Court, is a critical bellwether in linking the company’s talcum baby powder to ovarian cancer, marking the second instance within…
In a recent decision from a federal court in Delaware, the judge has narrowed the scope of a patent dispute between engagement agency BI Worldwide and Kobie Marketing Inc. The case revolves around patents that cover incentives offered online. The ruling saw two out of the three patents asserted by BI Worldwide being dismissed for…
Patagonia’s legal battle with drag queen and environmental activist Pattie Gonia has sparked widespread attention in both legal circles and popular media. The case presents a complex intersection of trademark enforcement and public relations, underscoring the challenges brands face when protecting intellectual property while maintaining a positive public image. Patagonia, known for its commitment to…
In a recent legal development, a California federal judge has dismissed copyright infringement claims against Al Jazeera in a dispute involving weather footage shared on YouTube. The lawsuit, initiated by a group of videographers, accused the network of falsifying copyright attribution with the intent to facilitate infringement. However, the court found that the plaintiffs did…
The shifting landscape of the legal industry is presenting new opportunities for boutique law firms to capitalize on their specialized expertise. According to a recruiter, “Boutiques are having an absolute moment in the sun,” capturing the attention of both clients and talent seeking niche services and dedicated attention. Increasingly, high-profile cases and complex legal matters…
In a significant development regarding LGBTQ+ rights in Hungary, prosecutors have dropped charges against Budapest Mayor Gergely Karácsony for organizing the 2025 Pride March. This decision comes after a ruling by the European Court of Justice that deemed Hungary’s anti-LGBTQ+ legislation inconsistent with the foundational values of the European Union. The court’s decision underscored that…
In a significant escalation, Chinese authorities have prohibited family members from visiting the Wan’an Cemetery, where those who perished during the Tiananmen crackdown are interred. Amnesty International has criticized this unprecedented move, marking the first such restriction in 37 years. The Tiananmen Mothers, a group of activists related to the victims, received notification that their…
The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) is currently evaluating its approach to certain patent applications following an unusual ruling by the Federal Circuit. The court’s decision highlighted an “atypical” appeal, prompting the USPTO to question the value of continuing to review patent applications that do not conclude with enforceable rights for their holders. This…
In an effort to address the lack of adequate legal representation across North Carolina, the state’s Supreme Court has launched a significant initiative by forming the Commission on Practice Innovation. This body is tasked with exploring solutions for the 48 counties, out of North Carolina’s 100, classified as legal deserts—areas with fewer than one attorney…
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has ruled against the validity of patent claims concerning expandable implants utilized in spinal fusion surgeries. These claims previously underpinned a substantial $9.5 million jury verdict against Life Spine Inc. The court’s decision reversed prior judgments made by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, reshaping the…
On April 23, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit delivered a decision in Richardson v. Townsquare Media Inc., marking a consequential moment for publishers and digital media enterprises concerning the application of platform terms of service as a copyright license. This ruling underscores the potential protections for publishers embedding third-party content, in…
J.D. Power has initiated a legal battle against Chime Financial Inc., lodging a complaint in New York federal court. The firm accuses Chime of patent trademark infringement, claiming the fintech giant has engaged in misleading advertising practices. The allegations center on Chime’s promotion of itself as “America’s #1 Choice for Banking,” a claim J.D. Power…
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has affirmed the decisions of a Delaware federal court, ruling in favor of Google LLC and Oath Holdings Inc. in patent infringement lawsuits filed by Arendi S.A.R.L. The appellate court concurred with the lower court’s determination that the patents in question were invalid, thereby upholding…
Lawyers for Meta and YouTube are vigorously pushing to overturn a recent $6 million verdict related to social media addiction. During post-trial arguments, they highlighted that the jury had been presented with evidence involving content protected by the Communications Decency Act, specifically Section 230, which provides immunity to platforms for third-party content. They also invoked…
The U.S. Supreme Court has upheld the Federal Communications Commission’s (FCC) authority to impose fines on telecommunications companies, rejecting challenges from AT&T and Verizon. In an 8-1 decision, the Court affirmed that the FCC’s process for issuing financial penalties does not violate the Seventh Amendment right to a jury trial. ([theguardian.com](https://www.theguardian.com/business/2026/jun/04/verizon-att-supreme-court-decision?utm_source=openai)) The case originated from…
Elon Musk’s latest attempt to evade stringent oversight by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) over the data handling practices of X, formerly known as Twitter, is drawing significant attention. These efforts follow a restrictive data-privacy order imposed by the FTC shortly before Musk took control of the platform. The order places strict limitations on how…
A retired plastic surgeon has agreed to a $7.7 million settlement with the federal government, following allegations by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) regarding an offshore employee leasing scheme. The agreement, filed in an Ohio federal court, signals the end of a tax controversy involving the former medical professional’s financial affair overseas. More details about…
In a significant development for the real estate brokerage industry, North Carolina’s business court has ruled against two former sales directors from a brokerage firm who attempted to recruit their former colleagues for a competing company. This decision is poised to impact recruitment strategies and competitive practices within the sector. The court’s decision stems from…
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is currently undergoing a period of significant regulatory activity, setting in motion a series of proposals that could reshape disclosure practices for public companies. This spring, the commission proposed to ease disclosure regulations for initial public offerings (IPOs), aiming to streamline the process and potentially encourage more companies…
The Sixth Circuit Court has confirmed that Procter & Gamble can continue to market its Spruce weed killer, rejecting Scotts Miracle-Gro Company’s legal attempt to halt its sale. Scotts had sought an injunction on the basis that P&G’s product packaging infringed on its trade dress, but the court found the argument lacking. In the decision…