Constitutional law, by its nature, is ever-evolving, and while some amendments receive considerable judicial interpretation, others remain conspicuously dormant in the Supreme Court’s docket. Noteworthy among the underexplored constitutional clauses are the 13th Amendment’s “exception clause,” the guarantee clause of Article IV, and the Third Amendment. These provisions, albeit rarely prompted for judicial review, pose significant questions regarding personal liberty, governance, and property rights.
The “exception clause” of the 13th Amendment, despite its profound implications for forced labor and servitude, has been sparingly interpreted by the Supreme Court. Ratified in 1865, the Amendment prohibits slavery except as punishment for crime. Its court appearances, including the 1911 ruling in Bailey v. Alabama, showcase the court overturning attempts by states to criminalize contract breaches as a way to enforce involuntary labor. Despite sporadic legal scrutiny, the matter remains largely untouched by the high court, even as legislative efforts attempt to remove the clause.
For the guarantee clause, which promotes a “Republican Form of Government,” judicial engagement remains minimal. Historically, the court has deemed it non-justiciable, starting with Luther v. Borden in 1849, whereby it refrained from defining what a republican government entails. The clause was sidestepped even in 2019’s gerrymandering challenge in Rucho v. Common Cause, where Justice Roberts dismissed the notion of judicial intervention. Despite vague gestures towards its justiciability, the clause remains largely inactivated judicially.
The Third Amendment is perhaps the most neglected, dealing with the quartering of soldiers in private homes. Rarely litigated, it was notably debated in the 1982 case of Engblom v. Carey, concerning the eviction of correction officers to house National Guardsmen. With no Supreme Court engagement, its relevance continues to be ancillary, often invoked to bolster arguments concerning privacy from government intrusion as discussed in lower courts.
Whether these clauses will eventually garner the Supreme Court’s attention remains uncertain, yet their implications for constitutional democracy are profound. The reconsideration of labor rights under the 13th Amendment, democratic assurances under the guarantee clause, and privacy under the Third highlight critical constitutional themes potentially awaiting judicial exploration.
For the complete article, please visit the source on SCOTUSblog.