In a strategic legal maneuver, Mayne Pharma has reached a settlement with Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. over the market entry of a generic version of Imvexxy, an oestradiol vaginal insert. This agreement, announced recently, stipulates that Teva will delay launching its generic alternative until 2032, extending Mayne Pharma’s market exclusivity for several more years. This…
In a heated legal dispute, the woman accused of attempting to assassinate U.S. Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh has criticized federal prosecutors for what she describes as a “wildly inaccurate description” of the circumstances surrounding her sentencing. She argues that the portrayal by prosecutors misrepresents a Maryland federal judge’s decision and incorrectly suggests leniency based…
In a significant legal development, DeviantArt has petitioned a California federal judge to disqualify Crowell & Moring LLP from representing Evox Productions in a pivotal intellectual property lawsuit. The case centers around allegations that multiple artificial intelligence companies utilized Evox’s copyrighted car images to train their AI image generators. DeviantArt contends that Crowell & Moring…
In a recent legal victory for New York City, a federal judge dismissed a lawsuit from the former Trump administration challenging the city’s sanctuary policies. The administration had contended that these policies unconstitutionally obstructed federal immigration enforcement. However, the court ruled that the federal law cited by the administration does not override the sanctuary provisions…
In a recent legal development, a federal judge has refused to recuse himself from proceedings involving the Philadelphia District Attorney’s Office. This decision follows the judge’s earlier call for an investigation into the office, which was met with a bid for recusal by District Attorney Larry Krasner. The judge described Krasner’s request as “frivolous” and…
Norton Rose Fulbright emerged victorious in a malpractice lawsuit involving a former client who had alleged negligence over a missed patent fee payment. An Illinois state judge dismissed the company’s $100 million claim, ruling that the statute of limitations had expired before the firm allegedly acknowledged any error. The judgment indicates that the deadline to…
Sri Lankan Deputy Foreign Minister Arun Hemachandra recently announced on X that the Saudi Supreme Court quashed the death sentence of Anojan Sivarasa, a 24-year-old Tamil migrant worker. Sivarasa, who was arrested in July 2026 over a blasphemous comment on Facebook, saw his initial sentence of five years and a fine increased to death by…
In a recent development in the ongoing investigation into Huawei’s compliance with U.S. sanctions and intellectual property laws, a former FBI agent recounted his interview with Ren Zhengfei, the founder and CEO of the Chinese telecommunications giant. During the testimony delivered to a Brooklyn federal jury, the agent described Ren’s demeanor as composed and cooperative….
Solidus Labs, a fintech-focused market surveillance firm, has announced the appointment of a former U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) attorney to lead its policy efforts, a move reflecting the increasing intersection of regulatory oversight and the rapidly evolving crypto landscape. The attorney, who previously advised lawmakers on significant crypto legislation, is expected to leverage…
In a notable development, former attorney Alex Murdaugh filed an appeal with the Fourth Circuit, seeking the revival of his civil suit against a court clerk. The lawsuit, initially dismissed, alleges jury tampering which Murdaugh claims compromised his murder trial. Murdaugh argues that his defense, valued at $600,000, was undermined by the clerk’s alleged interference,…
In a significant legal development, an Ohio federal judge has delivered contrasting rulings in two intellectual property lawsuits filed by Weekend Warrior Clothing. The cases involve allegations of copyright infringement against tech giants Google and Amazon, with notable differences in their outcomes. In the suit against Amazon, the court decided that the T-shirt company’s claims…
The Washington Supreme Court recently scrutinized claims of prosecutorial immunity made by a county prosecutor’s office in a case involving the alleged misuse of disqualification affidavits to bar a former judge from handling its cases. During the proceedings, questions arose regarding the prosecutorial conduct, particularly after a line-level prosecutor reportedly confirmed an officewide policy to…
In a recent legal development involving high-profile allegations of trade secrets theft, the former competition director of Joe Gibbs Racing, a prominent NASCAR team, is arguing against sanctions related to the deletion of text messages. The ex-director maintains that his forthrightness during proceedings should protect him from any penalties, despite the controversial nature of the…
A recent ruling by a Pennsylvania federal court determined that Avalara Inc., a tax software company, will not face sanctions for the destruction of evidence in a legal dispute regarding employee poaching. This conclusion followed the findings of a special master, who assessed that the rival firm in the case, despite claims to the contrary,…
Warner Music-affiliated record labels and publishers have petitioned an Ohio federal judge to sustain their copyright claims against DSW Shoe Warehouse Inc. This case raises significant questions about licensing practices in influencer marketing campaigns, particularly as music usage in social media ads continues to expand (Law360). The dispute highlights a broader issue within the industry…
The ongoing legal battle over HerdDogg, a notable agricultural technology company, intensified as the company urged the Delaware Chancery Court to reject a receivership plea. This petition, brought forward by HerdDogg’s founder, has been flagged by the company as an improper continuation of claims that had already been dismissed in previous litigation. The founder, however,…
A recent decision by Bucks County, Pennsylvania to appeal its climate change tort suit dismissal highlights the growing legal complexities surrounding environmental litigation. Initially dismissed due to lacking subject matter jurisdiction, this lawsuit reflects a broader trend of local governments seeking accountability from major fossil fuel companies for climate-related damages. The outcome of a pending…
Norton Rose Fulbright successfully defended against a $100 million malpractice lawsuit in an Illinois state court, a case that revolved around a former client’s missed patent fee payment. The court’s decision hinged on the timing of the client’s knowledge of the alleged oversight. It was ruled that the statute of limitations for filing the complaint…
A subsidiary of staffing giant Robert Half has come under scrutiny following accusations of discriminatory practices against pregnant employees. Allegations surfaced accusing Protiviti Inc., a consulting firm under the Robert Half umbrella, of laying off workers due to their pregnancy status. The accusations highlight ongoing issues in workplace discrimination that employers face in navigating family…
DeviantArt has filed a motion to disqualify Crowell & Moring LLP from representing Evox Productions in a California federal court. The dispute centers around claims that multiple AI companies have allegedly used Evox’s copyrighted car images to train AI image generators. DeviantArt contends that Crowell & Moring has breached its fiduciary duty by representing Evox,…
As the legal industry grapples with unprecedented changes driven by technology, shifting client expectations, and economic pressures, the question arises: Are we thinking about the future of law all wrong? An intriguing perspective emerges when legal leaders distance themselves from immediate challenges and envision the transformative forces that could redefine the business of law over…
Six Flags Magic Mountain in Southern California is embroiled in a series of legal challenges as over 100 individuals have initiated legal action following injuries allegedly sustained on the renowned X2 roller coaster. These legal claims focus on accusations of brain injuries purportedly incurred during rides, with three lawsuits already lodged in California courts. The…
OpenEvidence Inc., a medical artificial intelligence startup, along with competitors Doximity Inc. and Pathway Medical Inc., have informed a Massachusetts federal judge of a preliminary settlement agreement to resolve a contentious lawsuit and counterclaim. The litigation, initiated by OpenEvidence in June 2025, accused Doximity and its Chief Technology Officer, Jey Balachandran, and Director of AI…
In a ruling that underscores the strategic significance of venue in patent litigation, a federal court in Delaware decided that Zoom Communications Inc. cannot relocate its patent infringement lawsuit initiated by Ricoh Co. Ltd. The Japanese camera and electronics manufacturer had filed the suit against Zoom in Delaware, which has become a favored jurisdiction for…
In a significant development affecting trademark law involving Native American tribes, the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) has issued a ruling with implications for trademark strategy and the defenses available to tribes. On September 18, the TTAB ruled in Philip Morris USA Inc. v. IP Services International Inc. that tribal sovereign immunity cannot be…