London Litigation Update: Funeral Plan Claim, MaxBet’s New Cases, and BMW’s Dieselgate Woes

In London’s recent legal discourse, several significant cases have emerged that may impact corporates, law firms and entities in various sectors. Specifically, noteworthy developments include a collapsed funeral plan business lodging a claim against its ex-director, gambling hall operator MaxBet initiating two new claims over a problematic acquisition, and automaker BMW contending with additional class…

Read More

Monster Energy Loses Trademark Battle to Vape Company’s “Ice Monster” Brand

In a recent development, Monster Energy, a well-known beverage company, lost a sophisticated challenge at the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB). The case revolved around a Florida-based vape company filing a trademark application for the phrase “Ice Monster” to represent a new range of e-cigarette products. Monster Energy…

Read More

Edible Arrangements Scores Partial Victory in IP Dispute with Startup

In a recent development impacting the corporate legal landscape, a Georgia federal judge has partially dismissed a lawsuit lodged by a startup against renowned fruit gift arrangement company, Edible Arrangements, on the grounds of intellectual property theft. Notably, the court has made significant trims to the case, specifically omitting copyright and trade secret claims, on…

Read More

E-Cigarette Giant VPR Brands Battles Intellectual Property Dispute with Chinese Manufacturer

Recently, VPR Brands issued a notable challenge to a Georgia federal court, requesting a dismissal of counterclaims alleging that its latest product violated the intellectual property rights of Elfbar, an e-cigarette produced by a Chinese manufacturer. The crux of VPR Brands’ argument is that there is nothing deemed "distinctive" in the "shape, coloring, font [or]…

Read More

Massachusetts Supreme Court Upholds Good Faith Defense in Attorney Misconduct Cases

In a turn of current legal proceedings, The Massachusetts Supreme Court ruled last Thursday that supervising attorneys might sidestep severe sanctions in cases of misconduct if they were acting in good faith, relying on information provided by subordinate attorneys. This verdict came as penalties were being assessed for former prosecutors found to have concealed information…

Read More