Former Rouse Disputes Head Douglas Clark Joins Tanner De Witt to Strengthen Intellectual Property and Arbitration Practices

Douglas Clark, the former head of global disputes practice at U.K. intellectual property firm Rouse, is slated to join Hong Kong’s independent law firm Tanner De Witt. Come September 1, he is set to commence his role as a partner, with plans to build its intellectual property practice whilst assisting in the expansion of its…

Read More

Legal Tech Expert Steve Errick Joins AAA as Senior VP Focusing on AI and Tech in Dispute Resolution

Legal tech and publishing veteran Steve Errick, previously the chief operating officer at Fastcase and head of the Legal Research Information Division at LexisNexis, has recently taken up a new role with the American Arbitration Association (AAA) as senior vice president and chief development officer. In his new role, Errick will guide various strategic initiatives,…

Read More

Axiom Ince Partner Appeals SRA Suspension in High Court Battle

In a compelling development, the recently suspended partner of Axiom Ince has taken his appeal to the High Court against what his counsel referred to as a ‘draconian’ decision by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA). The senior partner’s lawyer mentioned that his client was ‘very shocked and distressed’ by this unexpected intervention from SRA. Unfortunately,…

Read More

Navigating the Complexities of International Law in a Globalized Economy

In an era characterized by rapid technological advancement and ever-evolving global regulatory landscapes, the legal sector finds itself at the crossroads. As corporations and law firms expand their activities across multiple jurisdictions, they face increasingly complex legal challenges, some of which have global implications. Take, for instance, the impact of the European Union’s General Data…

Read More

Arbitration as Litigation: Clarifying Work Product Protection Under FRCP 26(b)(3)

The question of whether arbitrations count as “litigation” for work product purposes under the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(3) has often been a subject of heated debate amongst legal practitioners. According to the rule, protection extends to documents prepared “in anticipation of litigation or for trial.” The critical terminology under scrutiny here is “anticipation…

Read More

CMS Suspends No Surprises Act Arbitration Process for Second Time: Legal Implications in Healthcare Industry

For legal professionals across the globe, it’s imperative to stay updated with recent developments in legal news. One such noteworthy announcement is the suspension of the arbitration process for “Surprise Billing” put in place by the “No Surprises Act”. This marks the second time the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has opted to…

Read More

PAGA Plaintiffs Retain Standing Amid Individual Arbitration Shifts

In a development that resonates through the legal community, plaintiffs who launch representative claims under the Private Attorneys General Act of 2004 (PAGA), still have standing in court even after their individual claims are directed towards arbitration. This follows one month after the U.S. Supreme Court opposed California’s prohibition on enforcing agreements that mandate the…

Read More

Singapore Court Addresses Arbitral Tribunal’s Power to Enforce Procedural Timelines

In a noteworthy shift of legal attitudes, Singapore International Commercial Court (“SICC”) recently assessed the extent to which an arbitral tribunal can exclude evidence after a specific date. As the legal saying goes, arbitral tribunals have long been considered the masters of their own procedures. However, this latest judgement proposes some limitations. The case tackling…

Read More

Texas Supreme Court Backs Arbitration Clauses in Construction Disputes: Impact and Implications

In a pivotal move, the Texas Supreme Court recently ruled in favor of developers and builders looking to enforce arbitration agreements in construction cases. Two key victories gave tremendous impetus to the principle of ‘Arbitration for All’. Contrary to previous presumption, the court ruled that household members and subsequent purchasers bringing a construction defect claim…

Read More

Offshore Jurisdictions Enhance Global Legal Infrastructure Through Arbitral Award Enforcement

The enduring rise of arbitration as a chosen route for dispute resolution has led to a surging requirement for arbitral awards to be acknowledged and executed in offshore jurisdictions. This developing trend is an observation underlined by some of the world’s strongest offshore jurisdictions— Bermuda, the British Virgin Islands, the Cayman Islands, Guernsey, Ireland, and…

Read More

UK Court Rejects Enforcement of California Arbitration Award, Citing Consumer Rights and Financial Markets Acts

In a noteworthy ruling, the English Commercial Court has denied recognition and enforcement of a California-seated arbitration award, opining that the enforcement would violate UK public policy. The Court stated this would be in direct conflict with principles outlined in the Consumer Rights Act 2015 (CRA 2015) and the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000…

Read More

California Supreme Court Clarifies PAGA Standing in Light of Enforceable Arbitration Agreements

On July 17, 2023, the California Supreme Court issued a key decision which clarifies the impact of enforceable arbitration agreements on standing for California’s Private Attorneys General Act of 2004 (“PAGA”). Previous ambiguity over the issue followed the United States Supreme Court decision in Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. Moriana, 142 S. Ct. 1906 (2022),…

Read More

Ninth Circuit Ruling Confirms Domino’s Truck Drivers’ Exemption from Federal Arbitration Act

In a unanimous decision on July 21, 2023, a three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit once again confirmed a ruling by a California federal court. The ruling states that truck drivers, who deliver ingredients from Domino’s Southern California Supply Chain Center to Domino’s California franchisees, are exempt from the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA). The reported…

Read More

New York Court Dismisses $145M Foreign Arbitration Award: A Challenge in Enforcing International Judgments

In a recent development, the Southern District of New York dismissed a petition to confirm a foreign arbitration award amounting to $145 million. The award was initially rendered in Hong Kong, but the court made its decision to dismiss based on lack of personal jurisdiction. The case brought to the attention the complexities surrounding the…

Read More

Ninth Circuit Upholds Delegation Clause, Strengthening Arbitration Agreement Independence

In a noteworthy development, the United States Ninth Circuit Court recently upheld the validity of a clause delegating authority to arbitrate, even if the larger arbitration agreement is null and void. This ruling emphasizes the standing of the delegation clause as an individual agreement that is separate from, and not contingent upon, the overall enforceability…

Read More