UN Report Unveils Systematic Human Rights Violations Against Migrants in Libya Amid Political Instability

The United Nations Human Rights Office, alongside the UN Support Mission in Libya, has released a detailed report exposing systematic human rights violations and abuses faced by migrants, refugees, and asylum seekers in Libya. The report identifies several serious challenges including illegal interceptions at sea, violence at borders, human trafficking, and arbitrary detention, contributing to…

Read More

Court Blocks ICE Re-Detention of Asylum Seeker, Emphasizing Legal Boundaries in Immigration Enforcement

A recent decision from the US District Court of Maryland has brought significant attention to immigration law and due process. Judge Paul Xinis ruled that Kilmar Abrego Garcia cannot be re-detained by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) due to the expiration of the removal period and concerns about constitutional rights. Under the guidelines of 8…

Read More

“Supreme Court Faces Crucial Immigration Challenges: Birthright Citizenship and Asylum Laws Under Scrutiny”

As the U.S. Supreme Court’s docket unfolds this term, immigration has emerged as a significant theme, interacting with policies set during different presidential eras. Although President Trump’s immigration strategies prominently influence current discussion, longstanding legal issues continue to percolate to the surface, irrespective of any single administration’s approach. One prominent case in front of the…

Read More

UK Labour Government Faces Criticism for Eroding Human Rights, Report Warns

Human Rights Watch (HRW) has expressed strong concerns about the current UK government’s human rights record under the leadership of the Labour party. In its World Report 2026, HRW criticizes various policies that allegedly undermine fundamental rights and freedoms. The report underscores issues with the UK’s handling of protests, specifically pointing to the Police, Crime,…

Read More

First Circuit Court Questions Legality of Trump’s Third-Country Deportations Amid Human Rights Concerns

The First Circuit Court of Appeals recently examined a policy from the Trump administration concerning the deportation of migrants to third countries, like Guatemala and South Sudan, where immigration judges had previously determined they were at risk of torture. A class action brought forth by these migrants highlights the legal challenges faced by such policies,…

Read More

Rwanda Initiates Arbitration Against UK Over Breached Migration Partnership Treaty

Rwanda has initiated legal proceedings against the United Kingdom for failing to meet financial commitments outlined in a now-canceled migration agreement. The Rwandan government filed a Notice of Arbitration to the Permanent Court of Arbitration, asserting that the UK breached obligations under the Treaty of the Migration and Economic Development Partnership (MEDP). This complaint highlights…

Read More

EU Solidarity in Crisis: The Complex Dynamics of Asylum and Migration Policies

Recent discussions surrounding the European Union’s approach to asylum and migration have sparked considerable debate over the principle of solidarity. This concept, intended to unify member states under shared responsibilities, seems to be distorted in practice. An in-depth analysis from the European Law Blog reveals how delegating solidarity may undermine the fundamental intentions behind such…

Read More

UN Committee Criticizes Australia’s Offshore Processing Policy After Torture Convention Violation

The United Nations Committee against Torture recently determined that Australia violated the Convention against Torture in handling the case of an Iranian asylum seeker, referred to as Mr A. The committee’s findings highlight serious concerns over Australia’s offshore processing policy and prolonged immigration detention practices. The full details of the findings are reported here. Mr…

Read More

US Immigration Detention Network Expands Amid Policy Shifts, Raising Rights Concerns

A recently published report by the American Immigration Council reveals a significant expansion in the network of facilities used by the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). This expansion nearly doubled last year, attributed to policies implemented by the Trump administration, which prioritized the detention of noncitizens. Many detainees held did not have criminal records,…

Read More

CJEU Rulings on Frontex Signal Shift in EU Asylum Law: Emphasizing Vulnerability and Fair Assessment

The recent judgments by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) concerning Frontex shed light on the intricate dynamics of asylum law, particularly in handling vulnerable applicants. These rulings are pivotal in understanding how causation and evidence are assessed under European Union law, especially in processes involving asylum seekers. Frontex, the European Border…

Read More

Venezuela’s Maduro Enlists High-Profile Lawyer Baltasar Garzón Amidst Global Legal and Political Pressure

Nicolás Maduro, the embattled president of Venezuela, has taken a strategic legal step by hiring renowned attorney Baltasar Garzón for his criminal defense. Garzón, a Spanish jurist, is notably recognized for representing Julian Assange, the founder of WikiLeaks. This move adds a significant weight to Maduro’s legal team as Venezuela continues to face international scrutiny…

Read More

Supreme Court Docket: How Historic Treaties and Current Rulings Shape U.S. Borders and Asylum Laws

On December 30, 1853, the historical Gadsden Treaty was signed by the U.S. minister to Mexico and the president of Mexico, clarifying U.S.-Mexico border boundaries. This treaty remains relevant today as it features prominently in an upcoming case before the Supreme Court that will determine whether asylum seekers must be physically present in the U.S….

Read More

Amnesty International Urges Global Leaders to Halt Deportations of Afghan Refugees Amid Escalating Human Rights Abuses

Amnesty International has issued a fervent plea to international leaders, urging them to cease the forced return of refugees and asylum seekers to Afghanistan. The call comes amid mounting human rights concerns, compelling countries to honor their commitments under international law. In a statement on Tuesday, Amnesty underscored that the forced deportations mark a stark…

Read More

Morrison Foerster Honored as 2025 Pro Bono Innovator for Community Service Excellence

Morrison Foerster has been named a Pro Bono Innovator for 2025, recognized for its innovative approaches and steadfast commitment to community service. This accolade, highlighted in Bloomberg Law, underscores the firm’s dedication to providing free legal services to underserved communities and advancing social justice causes. This distinction is awarded to law firms that demonstrate forward-thinking…

Read More

Lowenstein Sandler Honored as Pro Bono Innovator for 2025, Reinforcing Commitment to Legal Aid

Lowenstein Sandler has been recognized as a Pro Bono Innovator for 2025, a testament to their commitment to providing legal services to underserved communities. Known for its diverse portfolio, the firm has consistently prioritized public service, integrating pro bono work into its core values and operational strategies. This recognition highlights the firm’s continued dedication to…

Read More

Immigration Lawyers Face Rising Pressure and Mental Health Burden Amid Increasing Deportations

Amid a surge in deportations, immigration lawyers are confronting an escalating mental health crisis. The pressures of navigating complex legal cases against the backdrop of increased enforcement are causing unprecedented levels of burnout among legal professionals. Many are finding it difficult to sustain their practices as they grapple with emotional strain, diminished resources, and the…

Read More

Supreme Court to Review Contested U.S. Asylum Policy as Legal and Ethical Debates Intensify

The complexities of the United States asylum system often lie in interpretation and implementation of laws—which is precisely the issue in Noem v. Al Otro Lado, a case now under the Supreme Court’s spotlight. Historically, applying for asylum required a straightforward step: reaching U.S. soil and expressing the intent to seek asylum to an immigration…

Read More

Supreme Court Weighs Federal Court Role in Asylum Determinations: Urias-Orellana v. Bondi Case Analysis

The United States Supreme Court is currently deliberating a pivotal case, Urias-Orellana v. Bondi, which may redefine the extent of federal court involvement in asylum determinations. The case arose from Douglas Humberto Urias-Orellana, Sayra Iliana Gamez-Mejia, and their child, who sought asylum in the U.S. after fleeing El Salvador out of fear of persecution from…

Read More

Supreme Court December Docket: Key Cases on Copyright, Asylum, and Presidential Powers

The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) is set to commence its December session, with several key issues awaiting deliberation. Legal professionals and interested parties can follow the proceedings via the live audio feed. This session’s docket includes matters with potential ramifications for copyright regulations, asylum law, and First Amendment rights, among others, reflecting…

Read More

Supreme Court Docket for December: Key Criminal Law Cases and Their Implications for Judicial Review and Rights

In the legal world, December promises a series of intriguing discussions as the Supreme Court prepares to hear eight cases over two weeks, four of which are centered on aspects of criminal law. These cases highlight critical intersections of judicial review, immigration, civil rights, and capital punishment. The Supreme Court’s December docket offers a brief…

Read More