Supreme Court Ruling on Universal Injunctions Cites University of Chicago Scholar’s Work

In a significant Supreme Court ruling, Justice Amy Coney Barrett’s majority opinion heavily cited the work of University of Chicago law professor Samuel Bray. Professor Bray’s scholarship on the topic of universal injunctions was notably referenced, lending substantial support to Barrett’s argument that such injunctions overstep the authority granted to federal district court judges. His…

Read More

Federal Court Blocks Trump’s Executive Order on Birthright Citizenship Nationwide, Citing 14th Amendment Violations

A recent ruling by the US District Court for the District of New Hampshire has granted a nationwide injunction that blocks former President Donald Trump’s executive order aiming to restrict birthright citizenship in the United States. This injunction represents a critical legal triumph for civil rights advocates who have been engaged in a protracted battle…

Read More

Texas Magistrate Judge Suggests Dismissal of Danielle Strobel in CryptoZoo Lawsuit, Questioning Jurisdiction

In a recent development concerning the ill-fated blockchain initiative, CryptoZoo, a federal magistrate judge in Texas has recommended the dismissal of Danielle Strobel from ongoing litigation. Strobel, former assistant to prominent YouTuber Logan Paul and identified as a co-founder of the venture, stands accused in a proposed class action of being involved in an alleged…

Read More

Supreme Court’s Decision in Trump v. CASA Raises Questions on Government Stay Requests and Judicial Standards

Recent discourse around the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Trump v. CASA has brought attention to the Court’s approach to emergency stays for the government. The ruling emphasizes that federal courts lack the authority, under the Judiciary Act of 1789, to issue injunctions against government actions concerning non-parties, regardless of the constitutional or legal status…

Read More

Attorney Withdraws from Class Action Against Avvo, Highlighting Ongoing Legal Marketing Dispute

In a recent development, one of the two attorneys leading a class action lawsuit against Avvo Inc. has withdrawn her claims. The dispute centers around allegations that the online legal service provider unlawfully used the identities of over 1 million attorneys to endorse its legal marketing and referral services. This legal battle continues with significant…

Read More

Eckert Seamans Faces Class Action Lawsuit Over Alleged Data Breach of Wheeling University Alumni

Pittsburgh-based law firm Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott LLC is facing a proposed class action lawsuit alleging negligence in safeguarding the personal information of approximately 9,400 Wheeling University alumni. The lawsuit claims that the firm failed to adequately protect sensitive data, leading to its exposure during a data breach in April 2025. The breach was…

Read More

Sixth Circuit’s Ruling on Class Action Certification Could Reshape U.S. Litigation Landscape

In the recent edition of Law.com’s Critical Mass, Amanda Bronstad delves into key legal developments affecting class action and mass tort attorneys. Notably, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit has provided clarification on the certification of nationwide class actions. This development could impact the landscape of class action litigation across the United…

Read More

Legal Precedents Strengthen Employer Use of 401(k) Forfeitures Under ERISA Compliance

Recent legal developments have seen a series of class action lawsuits challenging how employers utilize forfeited funds within 401(k) plans. These cases primarily focus on whether using forfeitures to offset future employer contributions violates the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA). Courts have increasingly ruled in favor of employers, affirming the legality of this practice….

Read More

Jenner & Block Expands Appellate Expertise with Addition of Peter Davis in Washington, D.C. Office

Jenner & Block has announced the addition of Peter Davis as a partner in its appellate and Supreme Court practice in Washington, D.C. Davis brings extensive experience in appellate litigation, having represented clients across various federal circuits and state appellate courts. His practice encompasses a broad range of civil matters, including administrative law, antitrust, securities,…

Read More

Class Action Potential Rises as Supreme Court Limits Injunctions in Federal Workforce Cases

In the aftermath of a pivotal U.S. Supreme Court decision that limited the scope of universal injunctions, advocates for dismissed federal workers are preparing to mount a class-action approach against former President Donald Trump. This strategy marks a significant shift in how legal confrontations with government actions may proceed, as opponents challenge policies that led…

Read More

Supreme Court Ruling Spurs New Tactics in Birthright Citizenship Legal Challenges

In response to a recent Supreme Court ruling, immigrant-rights groups and Democratic-led states have revised their strategies in challenging President Donald Trump’s restrictions on birthright citizenship. This strategic shift comes after the Court’s June 27 decision, which affected previous legal victories by determining that nationwide injunctions are not permissible. The ruling by the Supreme Court…

Read More

US Appeals Court Reduces Attorney Fees in Poultry Price-Fixing Case, Signaling Scrutiny on Class-Action Settlements

In an ongoing legal saga surrounding a poultry price-fixing case, the US Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit has once again mandated a reduction in attorney fees, trimming the original award from 30% of the settlement to 26.6%. This marks the second successful challenge by a class member regarding the fee structure. The decision…

Read More

Class Action Lawsuits Mount Over Company Use of Forfeited 401(k) Assets

“`html Companies are currently dealing with a wave of class action lawsuits addressing their alleged practices concerning 401(k) assets. These suits allege that certain firms have improperly used assets forfeited by employees—intended for matching company contributions—for purposes benefiting the companies themselves, rather than the plan participants. With the legal landscape still being largely unsettled on…

Read More

Bumble Inc. Faces Turning Point as Court Weighs Derivative Suit Dismissal Motion

The Special Litigation Committee at Bumble Inc. recently made a case before the Delaware Court of Chancery, proposing the dismissal of a derivative lawsuit against the company. The committee’s counsel argued that their investigation into the matter was comprehensive and equitable, suggesting that the court accept their recommendation for closure. However, Vice Chancellor J. Travis…

Read More

Supreme Court Limits Federal Power on Universal Injunctions: Implications for Judicial Authority

The Supreme Court’s recent decision in Trump v. CASA has captured the attention of legal practitioners and scholars, as it confronts the contentious issue of universal injunctions. The ruling concluded that federal courts lack the statutory authority, under the Judiciary Act of 1789, to issue such broad orders, drawing fervent criticism for its perceived contraction…

Read More

Phelps Expands Jackson Litigation Team with Industry Veteran John Rouse

Phelps has announced the addition of John Rouse as a partner in their Jackson, Mississippi office, with an emphasis on products liability, financial services, and corrections health-care practices. This strategic recruitment, revealed Tuesday, underscores the firm’s commitment to bolstering its litigation capabilities in the region. Rouse brings a wealth of experience to his new role,…

Read More

Supreme Court’s Ruling on Nationwide Injunctions Poised to Influence Class Action Surge

The recent ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court on restricting nationwide injunctions could potentially catalyze an increase in the number of class actions. Legal discussions are abuzz with speculation on how this decision might influence the strategies employed by class action attorneys. The ruling’s potential implications are discussed in detail in this week’s Law.com Class…

Read More

Supreme Court Term Offers New Insights and Strategies for Employment Law Litigants

Employment law litigants have garnered significant insights from the recent term of the US Supreme Court, setting the stage for potential new strategies in workplace litigation. The court addressed pervasive issues such as federal overtime exemptions, retiree disability discrimination claims, and civil rights cases involving state agencies. These rulings provide fertile ground for reevaluating longstanding…

Read More

Germany’s Class Action Lawsuits Against TikTok and X Test Europe’s Data Privacy Regulations

TikTok and X are currently contending with two class action lawsuits in Germany, where claims are being made regarding alleged data breaches. These cases stand as significant tests of Europe’s emerging digital regulations, with the potential for affected users under the age of 21 to receive up to €2,000 in compensation if the allegations hold….

Read More

Legal Strategists Quickly Adapt to Supreme Court Ruling on Birthright Citizenship Challenges

In a swift reaction to a recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling, organizations challenging President Donald Trump’s birthright citizenship executive order have adjusted their legal strategy. The Court’s decision, which restricts federal judges from imposing nationwide injunctions, prompted these groups to transition from seeking these injunctions to filing class action complaints. This tactical change was observed…

Read More

Immigration Advocacy Groups Challenge Executive Order on Birthright Citizenship in Federal Lawsuit

Two national immigrants’ rights organizations, CASA Inc. and the Asylum Seeker Advocacy Project (ASAP), have taken legal action to block an executive order issued by President Donald J. Trump that aims to terminate birthright citizenship. On Friday, the groups filed a federal class-action lawsuit following a U.S. Supreme Court decision that restricts lower courts’ authority…

Read More