Dorsey & Whitney LLP Expands Litigation Team with Former Duke Energy Executive David Fountain

Dorsey & Whitney LLP has announced the addition of David Fountain as a partner in its Commercial Litigation group. Fountain brings extensive experience from his previous roles at Duke Energy and the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA). At Duke Energy, Fountain held several key positions, including Senior Vice President of Legal, Chief Ethics and Compliance Officer,…

Read More

Anthropic Seeks Ninth Circuit Aid in Copyright Clash Over AI Model Training Practices

Artificial intelligence developer Anthropic is currently seeking intervention from the Ninth Circuit to address a contentious decision by a California federal judge. The judge refused to delay a trial that involves allegations from authors accusing the company of unlawfully using their works to train its large language model, Claude. The case represents a pivotal moment…

Read More

Supreme Court’s Unanimous Ruling Expands Federal Fraud Prosecutions: Implications for Businesses and Legal Frameworks

In a recent decision, the United States Supreme Court has issued a unanimous ruling in the ‘Kousisis’ case that is poised to significantly broaden the scope of federal fraud prosecutions. At the heart of the ruling is the expansion of the prosecutorial reach of the wire fraud statute, specifically 18 U.S.C. Section 1343. This decision…

Read More

U.S. Department of Commerce’s Potential Control of Harvard Patents Sparks Legal Debate

Amidst the recent discussions surrounding intellectual property, attorneys are closely monitoring the situation where the U.S. Department of Commerce issued a profound statement that it could assume control over certain patents held by Harvard University. This unprecedented move has brought to the forefront issues of practicality and legality, inciting considerable debate among legal professionals. The…

Read More

Models Withdraw Lawsuit Against Philadelphia Strip Clubs Over Image Use, Ending Legal Dispute

A legal dispute involving a group of models, including Carmen Electra, has reached a resolution as the plaintiffs have withdrawn their lawsuit against three Philadelphia strip clubs. These clubs were accused of using the models’ likenesses without permission in their promotional materials. According to court filings in Pennsylvania federal court, the case was officially dismissed…

Read More

R.J. Reynolds Requests Supreme Court Review of $95 Million Patent Verdict Against Altria

R.J. Reynolds has petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to reconsider a $95 million verdict regarding its infringement on Altria’s vape-related patents. Central to the tobacco company’s appeal is the contention that the Federal Circuit’s ruling conflicts with the Supreme Court’s earlier mandates about calculating patent damages. Specifically, Reynolds maintains that such damages should be determined…

Read More

Settlement Ends Canadian Patent Dispute Over Staccato Cherries, Highlighting Global IP Challenges in Agriculture

The Canadian government’s recent settlement with cherry growers marks the conclusion of a contentious patent infringement case involving the prized Staccato cherry variety. The dispute emerged from claims raised by the Canadian government against two groups of cherry growers, whom it accused of violating intellectual property rights by cultivating the Staccato cherries without proper authorization,…

Read More

Roche Settles Trade Secret Dispute with Stanford Professors over Cancer Detection Technology

Subsidiaries of F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG have reached a settlement in a lawsuit involving allegations of trade secret theft from Stanford University professors. The case centered around the alleged misuse of proprietary information related to cancer detection technology, a field that continues to draw intense competition and innovation. According to the allegations, the intellectual property…

Read More

Philadelphia Law Firm Sues Rival Over Trademarked Slogan, Intensifying Legal Trademark Dispute

A personal injury lawyer in Philadelphia has initiated legal proceedings against a rival law firm, alleging unauthorized use of his trademarked advertising slogan, “We Win or It’s Free,” according to a federal court complaint filed recently. The complaint, filed by the Philadelphia attorney, claims that his rival has been leveraging the trademarked phrase to market…

Read More

Top Litigator Adil Khan Joins Vedder Price’s Los Angeles Office as Shareholder

Adil Khan, an esteemed litigator with a track record in complex business disputes, has joined the Los Angeles office of Vedder Price as a shareholder. Khan’s move to Vedder Price, a well-regarded business-focused law firm, is seen as a strategic enhancement of their litigation capabilities in Southern California. His expertise will undoubtedly benefit the firm’s…

Read More

Judge Upholds Class Action Opt-Out Procedures in Walgreens Prescription Case, Impacting Third-Party Administrators

The recent decision by a judge to deny an “en masse” opt-out request by Blue Cross Blue Shield (BCBS) entities in the Walgreens prescription class action has stirred significant discussion among legal professionals. The request was made by various BCBS entities acting as third-party administrators. They contended that the opt-out terms imposed were “unduly burdensome”…

Read More

Peter Borock Recognized in Bloomberg Law’s 40 Under 40 for Pioneering Work in Real Estate Finance

Peter Borock, a standout partner at Greenberg Traurig, has recently been spotlighted as one of the “40 Under 40” by Bloomberg Law. This accolade is awarded to young professionals who exhibit remarkable talent and promise within the legal field. His expertise in real estate finance and dedication to high-stakes transactions have earned him this recognition…

Read More

Baylor University Sues Boston University Over Trademark Dispute on Interlocking “BU” Logo

In recent developments within the realm of intellectual property law, Baylor University has initiated legal proceedings against Boston University, alleging trademark infringement concerning the usage of an interlocking “BU” logo. Baylor contends that Boston University’s use of a similar mark could potentially lead to confusion in the marketplace, as both institutions prominently feature this symbol…

Read More

Bipartisan Push for Cannabis Banking Reform Gains Momentum in U.S. Congress

A bipartisan coalition of 32 state attorneys general has urged Congress to pass the Secure and Fair Enforcement Regulation (SAFER) Banking Act of 2025, aiming to provide legal clarity for financial institutions serving state-regulated cannabis businesses. This initiative seeks to address public safety concerns and enhance states’ abilities to collect taxes and conduct regulatory oversight….

Read More

White & Case Enhances Chicago Litigation Strength with New Partner Acquisition from Perkins Coie

White & Case LLP has bolstered its litigation capabilities in Chicago by recruiting a prominent partner from Perkins Coie LLP, who has a background as an assistant U.S. attorney in the city. This strategic move aims to fortify White & Case’s position in the competitive legal market, leveraging the new partner’s experience in high-stakes white-collar…

Read More

“Proactive Leadership in Law: Michael Forde’s Blueprint for Success at Forde & O’Meara”

In the competitive world of law, leadership often transcends titles and hierarchical recognition. Michael Forde, of the Chicago-based firm Forde & O’Meara, exemplifies this ethos, advocating for a proactive approach to career advancement. His philosophy—“Act like an owner before you are one”—encapsulates the mindset necessary for budding attorneys aiming to carve a niche in the…

Read More

Trump Administration Considers Exercising March-In Rights on Harvard Patents Amid Concerns Over Federally Funded Research Obligations

In a rare move, the Trump Administration has taken steps to possibly invoke march-in rights on patents held by Harvard University, citing unmet obligations related to federally funded research. The action, as reported on August 8, 2025, by Law360, could see the government take control of intellectual property developed with federal assistance. March-in rights, a…

Read More

California Court Upholds Arbitration in Cross-Border Vape Market Dispute, Setting Precedent for International Business Contracts

In a significant development for international business arbitration, a federal judge in California has mandated that a Hong Kong-based vape manufacturer must submit its claims against an American competitor to arbitration. The dispute centers around allegations of the competitor attempting to replace the Hong Kong company’s position in the vaping market. Despite the founder of…

Read More

Pennsylvania’s Legal Landscape in 2025: Pesticide Verdicts, Tax Fraud Sentences, and Trademark Battles

The first half of 2025 has seen several judicial decisions in Pennsylvania that could significantly impact legal landscapes both within the state and nationally. Among the most high-profile rulings was the verdict against Monsanto, where a Philadelphia court ordered the company to pay $175 million in a mass tort case concerning its widely used pesticide,…

Read More

Democracy Forward Bolsters Legal Team, Launches New Appellate Practice to Challenge Policies

Democracy Forward Foundation has recently inaugurated an appellate practice, an expansion fueled by a robust hiring campaign that has effectively doubled its legal team. This strategic growth, highlighted by reports, follows a noticeable retreat by some private law firms from litigating cases that challenge current White House policies. The move signifies the nonprofit’s commitment to…

Read More

Nike’s Patent Invalidation by PTAB Could Impact Future Infringement Cases in Athletic Apparel Industry

In a pivotal decision, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) recently ruled that a Nike patent integral to a $355,450 damages award against Lululemon is invalid. This patent, which pertained to Nike’s footwear manufacturing process, was central to the earlier infringement case, raising significant implications within the competitive athletic apparel industry. The PTAB’s determination…

Read More

USPTO Upholds Havana Club Trademark Renewal, Challenging Bacardi’s U.S. Market Claims

In a significant decision impacting the trademark battle over the storied Havana Club rum brand, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has supported its former director’s decision to renew the trademark registration for a Cuban entity. This action comes despite strong opposition from Bacardi, challenging the renewal based on timing issues related to fee…

Read More