Constitutional – Page 11 – Legal News Feed

Law360

Trump Administration’s DOJ Challenges Federal Court’s Discovery Order on Controversial Executive Orders Against Law Firms

Pieter Gunst3 months ago04 mins

The Trump administration and the Department of Justice (DOJ) have expressed strong opposition to a federal court’s discovery order issued on August 3, which mandates the disclosure of individuals involved in drafting and approving executive orders targeting prominent law firms. This development arises from a lawsuit filed by the American Bar Association (ABA), challenging the…

SCOTUSblog

Exploring Shared Leadership: Rethinking the Role of the U.S. Supreme Court’s Chief Justice

Pieter Gunst3 months ago03 mins

The role of the Chief Justice in the United States Supreme Court is outlined by tradition rather than constitutional or statutory mandate. This flexibility opens the opportunity for the Chief Justice to delegate some of his responsibilities to fellow justices. Such a move could foster trust among the justices and encourage a variety of leadership…

SCOTUSblog

Supreme Court Blocks Trump Executive Order, Upholding Birthright Citizenship in Narrow 5-4 Ruling

Pieter Gunst3 months ago03 mins

In the landmark decision of Trump v. Barbara, the Supreme Court ruled 5-4 against Executive Order 14160, which had sought to end birthright citizenship for children of undocumented immigrants and temporary residents in the United States, deeming it unconstitutional under the 14th Amendment’s citizenship clause. If just one justice from the majority had taken a…

SCOTUSblog

Supreme Court Affirms Birthright Citizenship, Avoids Contentious Split Decision

Pieter Gunst3 months ago04 mins

The recent decision of the United States Supreme Court in Trump v. Barbara affirmed the unconstitutionality of an executive order seeking to end birthright citizenship for children born to undocumented immigrants in the U.S. Chief Justice John Roberts’ opinion, which was joined by Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, Ketanji Brown Jackson, and Amy Coney Barrett,…

SCOTUSblog

Trump v. Carroll: Supreme Court Weighs Free Speech and Defamation in High-Profile Case

Pieter Gunst3 months ago03 mins

The legal landscape continues to be shaped by high-profile defamation cases, with one such case involving former President Donald Trump and writer E. Jean Carroll before the Supreme Court. The case presents an intriguing blend of modern defamation challenges and classic constitutional debates, akin to the era-defining cases of the past, such as Lochner v….

Jurist

Legal Challenge to Ontario’s Cash Bail Policy Raises Crucial Questions on Charter Rights and Federal Authority

Pieter Gunst3 months ago04 mins

In a significant legal move, Canadian rights organizations have filed a constitutional challenge against Ontario’s newly instated mandatory cash bail policy. The challenge, presented by the Criminal Lawyers’ Association and the Canadian Civil Liberties Association (CCLA), questions the policy’s alignment with the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The rights groups argue that the policy…

Law360

Altria’s Legal Challenge Against ITC Puts Focus on Patent Dispute Jurisdiction Limits

Pieter Gunst3 months ago03 mins

Altria Group Inc. has brought a constitutional challenge against the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) before the Fourth Circuit, arguing that the agency lacks the authority to resolve private patent disputes and to restrict the importation and sale of products allegedly infringing on patents. This legal maneuver comes in response to a patent case initiated…

Law360

Ninth Circuit Court Blocks Untested Appointment of U.S. Attorney in Nevada, Citing Senate Confirmation Mandate

Pieter Gunst3 months ago02 mins

The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has affirmed a decision that blocks Sigal Chattah from serving as the acting United States Attorney for Nevada due to procedural issues in her appointment. This ruling aligns with previous judicial actions challenging the filling of such vacancies without Senate approval. The court’s decision indicates…

Law360

Morgan & Morgan Challenges Florida Bar’s Advertising Rule in First Amendment Lawsuit

Pieter Gunst3 months ago03 mins

In a significant legal clash over advertising rights, Morgan & Morgan, the high-profile personal injury firm, has initiated a lawsuit against the Florida Bar. The challenge comes in response to a bar rule that prohibits the use of celebrity voices or images in lawyer advertising, which Morgan & Morgan argues infringes upon First Amendment rights….

SCOTUSblog

Floyd Abrams at 90: A Legacy of Championing the First Amendment and Press Freedom

Pieter Gunst3 months ago05 mins

Floyd Abrams, often regarded as the dean of First Amendment lawyers, stands as a formidable figure in legal history, particularly for his steadfast commitment to freedom of speech and the press. As he turns 90, Abrams’ legacy continues to resonate within the corridors of the United States Supreme Court and beyond. His contribution to shaping…

SCOTUSblog

Justice Amy Coney Barrett’s Unconventional Path: Defying Conservative Expectations Through Judicial Nuance

Pieter Gunst3 months ago04 mins

Justice Amy Coney Barrett, a prominent figure in the U.S. Supreme Court, concluded the 2024 term with two notable dissents that highlighted her complex judicial philosophy, often defying the traditional conservative label. In Ohio v. EPA, Justice Barrett allied with the court’s liberal justices to oppose an emergency relief request from a major environmental regulation,…

Jurist

ICE Faces Backlash Over $20 Million Plan for Electric Shock Gloves Amid Civil Rights Concerns

Pieter Gunst3 months ago06 mins

Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has announced plans to allocate up to $20 million for the procurement of electric shock gloves, known as the G.L.O.V.E. (Generated Low Output Voltage Emitter), manufactured by Compliant Technologies. These devices are designed to deliver painful electric shocks to individuals, aiming to incapacitate them by disrupting muscle coordination. The initiative…

Jurist

France’s Constitutional Council Blocks Ban on Under-15 Social Media Use, Citing Rights Concerns

Pieter Gunst3 months ago03 mins

“`html The Constitutional Council of France recently rejected the proposed ban on social media use for individuals under the age of 15, deeming it unconstitutional. This decision was based on concerns that the law infringed on freedom of expression and communication rights. The council highlighted that a sweeping ban on all platforms, including social networks,…

Law360

Trump Appoints Brian Charles Lea as Federal Judge for Tennessee’s Western District

Pieter Gunst3 months ago04 mins

President Donald Trump has nominated Brian Charles Lea, a White House attorney and former BigLaw associate, to serve as a federal judge for the Western District of Tennessee. Lea’s nomination was announced on January 5, 2026, as part of a series of judicial appointments aimed at filling vacancies across the federal judiciary. Lea, a fourth-generation…

Bloomberg Law

Trump’s White House Lawyer Nomination for Tennessee Judgeship Deepens Judicial Impact

Pieter Gunst3 months ago03 mins

In a recent development, former President Donald Trump has nominated a White House lawyer for a federal judgeship in Tennessee. This choice aligns with Trump’s pattern of reshaping the judiciary, a hallmark of his administration, which saw the appointment of numerous federal judges across the United States. Trump’s nominee for the Tennessee federal bench comes…

Law360

Federal Circuit Clarifies Patent Licensing: Key Takeaways for Legal Practitioners and Corporations

Pieter Gunst3 months ago03 mins

On May 19, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit delivered a pivotal decision that sheds light on key aspects of patent licensing, particularly with regard to constitutional standing. The ruling, emerging from a dispute involving asphalt technology, offers valuable guidance for legal practitioners navigating the complexities of intellectual property agreements. These lessons…

Bloomberg Law

Indiana Court Upholds ‘Intellectual Diversity’ Law: Implications for Academic Freedom and Legislative Oversight

Pieter Gunst3 months ago04 mins

The Indiana ‘Intellectual Diversity’ law, a subject of controversy and debate, has recently been upheld in a significant appellate court decision. This development follows a legal challenge by a group of professors who argued that the statute adversely affects their First Amendment rights. The ruling signifies a pivotal moment in the ongoing discussion about the…

Law360

Trump Nominates Judge Lee Rudofsky to Influential Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals

Pieter Gunst3 months ago03 mins

In a notable judicial appointment, President Donald Trump has announced his intention to nominate Judge Lee Rudofsky, a jurist in the Eastern District of Arkansas, to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. This nomination marks another pivotal moment in the broader judicial strategy of the Trump administration. As detailed by Law360, Rudofsky’s…

SCOTUSblog

Supreme Court Expands Digital Privacy Protections, Requiring Warrants for Location Data Access

Pieter Gunst3 months ago04 mins

The Supreme Court’s recent decision in Chatrie v. United States has ignited discussions on the expansion of digital privacy under the Fourth Amendment. In a move echoing the 2018 decision in Carpenter v. United States, the court has now extended constitutional protections to one’s digital location data, requiring law enforcement to obtain a warrant before…

Bloomberg Law

Federal Ruling on NLRB Removal Protections Sparks Concerns Over Future Labor Case Management

Pieter Gunst3 months ago04 mins

The recent ruling by a federal judge on the removal protections of members of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) has introduced uncertainty regarding ongoing cases overseen by the agency. This decision could affect how cases are processed and potentially examined by higher courts, impacting both current and future labor relations proceedings. The recent case,…

Law360

Legal Standoff: Tom Goldstein Challenges DOJ’s $2 Million Forfeiture Demand Over Constitutional Fairness

Pieter Gunst3 months ago03 mins

In a tense confrontation over financial penalties, Tom Goldstein and the Department of Justice (DOJ) find themselves at odds, with the appellate advocate challenging the government’s demand for nearly $2 million. Goldstein, renowned for his defense in appellate courts, has voiced constitutional concerns regarding the DOJ’s forfeiture request. At the core of the dispute is…

Law.com

New Jersey Supreme Court Decision on Daniel’s Law Sparks Debate on Privacy and Free Speech Rights

Pieter Gunst3 months ago02 mins

The New Jersey Supreme Court recently issued a decision that has significant implications for Daniel’s Law, rejecting the necessity for mens rea, or criminal intent, in establishing liability. This ruling provides momentum to those arguing that the law infringes upon First Amendment rights by impeding free speech. Daniel’s Law, named in memory of U.S. District…

Bloomberg Law

New York City’s Pied-à-Terre Tax Battle: Legal Challenges and Broader Implications

Pieter Gunst3 months ago04 mins

The battle over New York City’s controversial pied-à-terre tax is gaining attention as one of its challengers, identified as a luxury condo owner, steadfastly distances himself from any affiliation with former President Donald Trump. The individual, whose identity has become a talking point in legal circles, asserts that he is not seeking the Trump Organization’s…

Bloomberg Law

DOJ Lawyer Avoids Ethics Sanctions in Controversial Journalist Search: A Legal and Press Freedom Analysis

Pieter Gunst3 months ago03 mins

The recent decision regarding a Department of Justice (DOJ) lawyer who avoided ethics sanctions has sparked interest and concern among legal professionals. The case involved a controversial search of a journalist’s home, bringing into focus the intricate dynamics between law enforcement practices and journalistic freedom. In this particular incident, federal prosecutors executed a search warrant…

SCOTUSblog

Congress Urged to Reaffirm Role in Legislative Process After Supreme Court Rulings

Pieter Gunst3 months ago03 mins

In the aftermath of the Supreme Court’s recent decisions, the onus now falls on Congress to engage constructively with the judicial rulings. A healthy federal government hinges on the dialogue between its branches, but this balance appears skewed with Congress often resorting to condemnatory rhetoric rather than legislative responses that reflect its constitutional responsibilities. As…