Knowledge Gap: Americans’ Alarming Misconceptions of First Amendment Rights

Recent findings reveal that an alarming number of Americans harbor misconceptions regarding their Constitutional rights, leading to what one could describe as a knowledge gap surrounding one of the nation’s most fundamental legislative cornerstones. The 2023 Annenberg Constitution Day Civics Survey posed questions to Americans regarding their understanding of the specific rights guaranteed by the…

Read More

Chapter 11 Debtor Dilemma: Uncertainty Looms as Supreme Court Sidesteps Remedy for Unconstitutional Fee Disparity

Legal professionals have been closely following the developments following the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Siegel v. Fitzgerald, 142 S. Ct. 1770 (2022). The court ruled that increased U.S. Trustee quarterly fees for large Chapter 11 debtors between 2018 and 2020 under the Bankruptcy Judgeship Act of 2017 (the “2017 Act”) were unconstitutional. The Court…

Read More

Supreme Court Case Alters CFPB Functioning: Debunking Myths and Analyzing New Challenges

Continuing the analysis of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s (CFPB) constitutional legitimacy fight, it’s paramount to debunk several related misconceptions. One of the most persistent myths is the supposed knockdown blow that the case represented for the CFPB’s regulatory functions or enforcement capabilities. Contrary to this widely held belief, the case CFSA v. CFPB, which…

Read More

Age Verification Laws Encounter 1st Amendment Roadblocks: Debating Online Privacy and Free Speech

The global discourse on the age verification measures for internet users has not subsided, with the governments of several countries favoring this approach in an attempt to control and protect online engagement. However, a spate of recently introduced age verification bills has run afoul of 1st Amendment rights, leading to these bills being deemed unconstitutional,…

Read More

California’s Non-Compete Statute Faces Potential Constitutional Challenge

California’s recent legislative move, a statute that invalidates non-compete agreements, has been stirring up controversial discussions amongst legal professionals. The question at the forefront is: Will this new statute survive any potential constitutional challenges that may arise? As JD Supra reports, Article I, Section 10 of the United States Constitution prohibits a state from passing…

Read More

Court Rules Small ‘Terms and Conditions’ Link Insufficient for Waiving Constitutional Rights: Unpacking Childs v. Fitness Int’l, LLC

In a notable U.S. legal case, the court ruled that the standalone, small link to the ‘Terms and Conditions’ page on a defendant’s website was not sufficient to waive the plaintiff’s constitutional rights. The case of Childs v. Fitness Int’l, LLC et al, heard in the U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania on May…

Read More

Biden Administration Appeals to Supreme Court in Social Media Content Regulation Dispute

In an ongoing dispute over content regulation on social media platforms, the Biden administration last Thursday made an appeal to the Supreme Court. The administration is seeking a temporary block of a lower court’s order which, they claim, limits its ability to converse with social media companies regarding their moderation policies. The appeal was first…

Read More

Revamping Public Defender Workload Standards: Ensuring Adequate Legal Representation

Recent issues facing public defenders, such as overburdening caseloads and low salaries, have been explored in a new study, released by the RAND Corporation, American Bar Association’s Standing Committee on Legal Aid and Indigent Defense, National Center for State Courts, and St. Louis lawyer Stephen Hanlon. Public defenders have voted to strike over their salaries,…

Read More

Montana Court Overturns Greenhouse Emission Provisions, Paving Way for Climate-Conscious Policy Shift

In a ruling that provides further grounds for discussion on the discord between environmental policy and legal interpretation, the Montana First Judicial District Court, Lewis and Clark County, recently handed down its Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law in the case of Held v. State of Montana, et al., effectively striking down certain provisions…

Read More

Five Memphis Officers Indicted for Fatal Beating: Constitutional Rights and Conspiracy Charges Follow

A federal grand jury has recently indicted five Memphis Police Department officers for their involvement in the fatal beating of Tyre Nichols. The officers, who have also been charged under Tennessee state law, have pleaded not guilty to these state charges. The officers indicted by the federal grand jury include Tadarrius Bean, Demetrius Haley, Emmitt…

Read More

Supreme Court Begins Hearing Capitol Riot Cases Amid Diverse Disputes

The news cycle on Wednesday, September 13, brought some noteworthy legal developments, providing plenty of discussions for legal professionals. Events encompassed everything from notable Supreme Court case proceedings to states seeking federal court attention. In one prominent story, the Supreme Court has begun hearing its first cases relating to the Capitol Riot which occurred on…

Read More

Atlanta City Hall Declines Signature Verification for “Cop City” Referendum due to Eleventh Circuit Stay

The City of Atlanta recently opted not to confirm a multitude of signatures gathered by protestors against the construction of a police and fire training center, known colloquially as “Cop City”. This decision unfolded after the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals issued a judicial stay earlier this month. Activists, combined under the banner of the…

Read More