Constitutional

Judge Blocks Mar-a-Lago Documents Report, Citing Unconstitutional Prosecution and Legal Prejudice Concerns

Pieter Gunst04 mins

A federal judge in the United States has halted the release of a report concerning classified documents discovered at Mar-a-Lago, former President Donald Trump’s Florida estate, following his successful motion to prevent public disclosure of prosecutorial findings in a now-dismissed case. The court’s decision centers on Special Counsel Jack Smith’s continued activities, which allegedly contravened…

Read More

Former ICE Attorney Testifies on Deficient Training Practices Amid Rapid Hiring Expansion

Pieter Gunst02 mins

Recent testimony from a former U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) attorney has brought attention to significant concerns regarding the agency’s training program. This ex-attorney testified before a Senate committee, emphasizing that he resigned to expose issues within the ICE-officer training amid a rapid hiring surge. The program was criticized for being “deficient, defective and…

Read More

Hong Kong Court’s Rejection of Key Activist Appeals Raises Human Rights Concerns, Amnesty Reports

Pieter Gunst03 mins

Amnesty International has expressed sharp criticism of the Hong Kong Court of Appeal’s recent decision to reject the appeals of the Hong Kong 47, a prominent activist group charged with “conspiracy to commit subversion” following the 2020 National Security Protests. This verdict, Amnesty stated, represents a missed chance to restore justice within the region’s legal…

Read More

Debate on Birthright Citizenship Intensifies as Supreme Court Takes on Trump v. Barbara

Pieter Gunst03 mins

The debate surrounding birthright citizenship in the United States remains heavily influenced by the constitutional principle of being born “under the flag,” which dates back to the 14th Amendment. This originalist interpretation foregrounds the notion that any child born on American soil is entitled to citizenship, provided that soil falls under American jurisdiction. The distinction…

Read More

Second Circuit Leadership Transition: Chief Judge Livingston to Take Senior Status, Impacting Judicial Appointments

Pieter Gunst03 mins

Chief Judge Debra Ann Livingston of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has announced her decision to take senior status this summer. This move opens another opportunity for a judicial appointment by President Donald Trump, marking another potential shift in the balance of the appellate judiciary. The Second Circuit, known for…

Read More

Conservative Ideological Divergence in Supreme Court’s Tariff Authority Ruling

Pieter Gunst04 mins

The recent Supreme Court decision in Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump has highlighted differences among the conservative justices regarding presidential power over tariffs. While the justices are often thought to vote as a bloc, this case showcased significant divergence in their interpretations, particularly around the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). All justices agreed that…

Read More

U.S. Supreme Court to Hear Colorado Climate Change Case Against Oil Giants

Pieter Gunst03 mins

In a notable development, the United States Supreme Court has decided to review a contentious case from Colorado involving climate change litigation against major oil and gas companies. The case, Suncor Energy Inc. v. County Commissioners of Boulder County, questions whether the activities of these companies, which Boulder County claims have knowingly accelerated climate change…

Read More

UN Urges Ireland to Integrate Human Rights in Environmental Policies as Emissions Targets Lag

Pieter Gunst04 mins

UN Special Rapporteur on the Right to a Clean, Healthy, and Sustainable Environment, Astrid Puentes Riaño, recently highlighted the importance of Ireland integrating human rights into its environmental decisions. This call to action follows her visit, where she emphasized the necessity of Ireland balancing investments with environmental and climate considerations to prevent any potential regression…

Read More

Alberta’s 2026 Referendum: Provincial Immigration Control and Constitutional Amendments Under Debate

Pieter Gunst04 mins

Alberta Premier Danielle Smith announced a referendum set for October 2026 that will address provincial immigration control and constitutional amendments. This move comes as Alberta faces economic challenges, including declining gas prices and rising immigration rates, which have influenced public discourse regarding provincial governance and autonomy. The referendum will present six critical questions to Albertan…

Read More

Trump Announces 10% Global Tariff Following Supreme Court Setback on Trade Powers

Pieter Gunst04 mins

In a significant development, President Donald Trump has announced a 10% global tariff following the US Supreme Court’s ruling that curtailed his use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) for imposing tariffs. The Court’s decision, described by Trump as “deeply disappointing,” invalidated his previous use of IEEPA to justify tariffs that were primarily…

Read More

Federal Judiciary Initiates Training to Tame Nationwide Injunctions Amid Legal Debate

Pieter Gunst03 mins

As the legal world watches developments unfold with interest, the federal judiciary is advancing in its efforts to implement new training programs designed to limit the controversial practice of nationwide injunctions. The move comes subsequent to a budget reconciliation bill enacted seven months ago, which included specific provisions aiming to address what Republicans assert are…

Read More

Supreme Court Clarifies Presidential Limits Under IEEPA in Tariff Case

Pieter Gunst05 mins

The Supreme Court’s recent decision in Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump has drawn considerable attention as it firmly establishes the limits of presidential power under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). In a direct challenge to executive authority, Chief Justice John Roberts, writing for the majority, clarified that the IEEPA does not permit the…

Read More

Supreme Court Invalidates Trump’s Tariffs, Reinforces Separation of Powers in Landmark Ruling

Pieter Gunst05 mins

In a significant legal development, the US Supreme Court recently invalidated former President Donald Trump’s tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). The decision, reached by a 6-3 majority, clarified that the IEEPA does not grant the president authority to impose tariffs, marking a pivotal moment in the separation of powers debate…

Read More

Supreme Court Invalidates Trump’s Tariffs, Affirming Congressional Authority Over Trade Taxes

Pieter Gunst05 mins

The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that President Donald Trump’s extensive tariff program is illegal, delivering a significant setback to a central component of his economic policy. The 6-3 decision, issued on February 20, 2026, found that the administration exceeded its authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) by imposing broad import taxes…

Read More

Kenya’s High Court Ruling Bolsters Freedom of Expression by Overturning Controversial Disturbance Law

Pieter Gunst03 mins

The High Court of Kenya’s recent decision to nullify Section 95(1)(b) of the Penal Code has been welcomed by many as a pivotal development for freedom of expression in the country. The now-overturned law had criminalized creating a disturbance likely to breach the peace, enabling police to arrest individuals for causing public commotion or behaving…

Read More

US House Approves SAVE Act Tightening Voter Registration Requirements, Sparking National Debate

Pieter Gunst04 mins

The US House of Representatives recently passed the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act (SAVE Act) in a narrow 218-213 vote, marking a significant shift in the country’s voter registration landscape. This new legislation, spearheaded by Representative Chip Roy, aims to implement stricter registration requirements by mandating prospective voters to provide both proof of US citizenship…

Read More

Former Judge Files Federal Lawsuit Alleging Unconstitutional Removal from Illinois Bench Over Controversial Comments

Pieter Gunst04 mins

Retired Cook County Circuit Judge James R. Brown has initiated a federal lawsuit against the justices of the Illinois Supreme Court, alleging that his removal from the bench violated his constitutional rights. The lawsuit, filed on February 19, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, contends that the justices deprived…

Read More

Justice Department’s Historical Interpretation Under Scrutiny in U.S. Birthright Citizenship Debate

Pieter Gunst04 mins

The ongoing legal debate surrounding birthright citizenship in the United States has gained renewed focus as the Justice Department supports an executive order issued by former President Donald Trump. This order seeks to end the automatic granting of U.S. citizenship to children born in the country to parents who are neither U.S. citizens nor lawful…

Read More

Supreme Court Docket Highlights: Landmark Cases and Transparency Reforms in Focus

Pieter Gunst03 mins

On February 19, President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s issuance of Executive Order 9066 in 1942 is remembered for authorizing the relocation of Japanese Americans to internment camps. This controversial decision was reaffirmed as constitutional by the Supreme Court in 1944, asserting that such actions were within the war-time powers of the President and Congress. However, this…

Read More

Texas Court Dismisses Copyright Infringement Claims Against A&M Employee, Citing Sovereign Immunity

Pieter Gunst04 mins

In a notable decision for state employees, a federal judge in Texas has dismissed copyright infringement claims against a Texas A&M University athletics communications employee. The lawsuit alleged that the employee unlawfully posted excerpts from a book regarding the university’s well-known “12th Man” tradition online. The court ruled that the employee was immune from such…

Read More