Recent trends in litigation have highlighted an intriguing development involving student-led lawsuits against universities. These cases, often dubbed “gift card” suits, have surfaced primarily from students seeking financial redress due to the inadequacies of services reported during the pandemic. As students demand compensation for services they argue were not provided, the legal landscape surrounding higher…
As the trial between Live Nation and AEG Worldwide approaches its conclusion, significant developments have unfolded in the Manhattan courtroom. Live Nation wrapped up its defense with compelling testimony from the manager of rap artist Drake. This testimony is a key part of Live Nation’s efforts to fend off a lawsuit alleging monopolistic practices in…
DLA Piper has recently been in the spotlight following a favorable ruling concerning a contentious $480,000 attorney fee. The dispute revolved around the interpretation of a contractual agreement, with the law firm’s victory underscoring the complex nature of fee arrangements between attorneys and their clients. The decision, handed down by the court, emphasizes the necessity…
In a notable development concerning legal disputes over compensation, a Texas appeals court has maintained the momentum of a lawsuit filed by the former general counsel of a dairy equipment manufacturer regarding unpaid bonuses. This decision underscores the evolving landscape of employment litigation, particularly with the application of anti-SLAPP laws. The court held that updated…
Kirkland & Ellis LLP has expanded its government contracts practice by bringing on board two attorneys from DLA Piper. The firm announced on April 7, 2026, that an Austin, Texas-based partner and a Washington, D.C.-based associate have joined their team. This strategic move underscores Kirkland & Ellis’s commitment to enhancing its capabilities in the government…
A US federal appellate court recently issued a decision that the New Jersey Division of Gaming Enforcement (NJDGE) cannot enforce state sports-betting laws against the financial services company Kalshi while ongoing litigation unfolds. This ruling provides Kalshi, a prediction market facilitator, with the interim ability to continue offering its event contract trading platform, despite legal…
In a recent verdict delivered by a Florida jury, AIG has been ordered to pay $110,000 to defense counsel, highlighting ongoing complexities within insurance litigation. The case revolves around allegations of underpayment to legal representatives under insurance coverage agreements. This decision comes amidst broader scrutiny of insurer practices in meeting obligations to their policyholders and…
As the legal industry grapples with the applications and limitations of generative AI, Australian legal automation platform Josef has announced its latest innovation: the Rapid Ingestion Engine. Designed to tackle the upstream challenges of converting unstructured business inputs into structured legal workflows, this tool is positioning AI at the less contentious, yet critical, phase of…
The Trump administration’s recent attempt to reinstate executive orders that revoke the security clearances of several prominent law firms could significantly impact arbitration practices in the United States. The College of Commercial Arbitrators is advocating for the D.C. Circuit to reject these federal appeals, arguing that the administration’s actions could threaten the foundation of U.S….
In a pivotal decision for the intersection of federal and state regulation, the US Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit has determined that New Jersey cannot impose state laws on sports bets placed on prediction markets. This decision reinforces the exclusive jurisdiction of the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) over designated contract markets…
The 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals has issued a landmark ruling in favor of Kalshi Inc., effectively exempting its sports contracts from New Jersey’s stringent gambling laws. In a 2-1 decision, the court affirmed that Kalshi’s event contracts align with the Commodity Exchange Act’s definition of “swaps,” and as such, fall under the jurisdiction of…
A recent settlement has resolved a copyright infringement dispute involving Highland Mint, a sports memorabilia company, and a professional photographer. The case centered on an alleged unauthorized use of a photograph of Barry Sanders, the former Detroit Lions running back, in the making of a collectible statue. Both parties submitted a request to a New…
Litigation attorney Grant Van Gundy has joined the ranks of Buchalter in their San Francisco office, a strategic move that underscores the firm’s commitment to expanding its West Coast presence. This development marks a significant addition to Buchalter’s robust litigation team, known for handling complex cases across various sectors. Van Gundy brings to Buchalter extensive…
In recent days, the Delaware Chancery Court has seen a docket filled with complex corporate disputes, insider trading allegations, and contract disagreements. Among these are new rulings that are reshaping areas like fiduciary duty and deal litigation. This court, often the epicenter for high-profile corporate governance due to Delaware’s status as the legal home for…
A recent legal decision in Italy has sent ripples through the streaming industry, as a court in Rome has ruled against Netflix over its series of price hikes imposed on subscribers over the past several years. This decision mandates that the company refunds impacted customers up to 500 euros, approximately $576, depending on their subscription…
In the aftermath of the 2022 ruling in Badgerow v. Walters, the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision has sparked ongoing deliberation within the federal judiciary regarding the scope of their jurisdiction over arbitration awards. This case elucidated that the enforcement of arbitral awards is generally treated as a straightforward state law contract issue. Consequently, federal courts…
In a notable decision impacting the scope of cyber insurance, a cyber insurer successfully defended against a law firm’s claim related to losses from an imposter email scam. This ruling underscores the complexities of coverage agreements and the importance of detailed policy scrutiny by legal professionals. The case involved a law firm that fell victim…
The Missouri Court of Appeals for the Eastern District has reinvigorated a legal battle involving St. Louis-based medical device developers, Kogent Surgical and Katalyst Surgical, against the global entity Carl Zeiss Meditec. The decision to revive the lawsuit hinges on allegations that Carl Zeiss Meditec delayed product development to circumvent paying significant contingent milestone payments…
Lumber Co., a prominent player in the timber industry, has taken a significant step in reshaping its legal leadership. The company recently announced the promotion of its Deputy General Counsel to the position of General Counsel. This move comes as part of Lumber Co.’s strategic efforts to streamline its legal operations and strengthen its leadership…
In a significant move to address the challenges and opportunities presented by artificial intelligence, California Governor Gavin Newsom has mandated that state agencies reinforce the regulations governing contracts related to generative AI tools. This directive, announced on Monday, emphasizes perceived dangers to fundamental civil liberties, such as free speech and voting rights, while also acknowledging…
The Delaware Chancery Court remains at the forefront of business law, hosting a docket replete with cases involving high-profile corporations and substantial financial disputes. Recently, the court addressed significant contract battles, revived claims, and concluded a closely monitored de-SPAC case that captured widespread interest. One notable case involved a disagreement over high-dollar contracts, highlighting the…
In a recent U.S. Supreme Court session, justices expressed skepticism over a legal argument concerning the jurisdiction of federal courts in arbitration cases. The core issue presented was whether these courts possess automatic jurisdiction to confirm or vacate arbitration awards. Justices described the argument as “odd” and “peculiar” during the oral proceedings, suggesting that the…
Tilray, a prominent player in the cannabis industry, faces allegations of failing to fulfill royalty obligations exceeding $11 million linked to the use of the Bob Marley brand for its marijuana products. This accusation comes in the form of a lawsuit recently filed in Delaware Chancery Court, highlighting a potentially contentious legal battle over trademark…
The recent ruling involving Nicklaus Companies has cast a spotlight on the intersection of name, image, and likeness (NIL) rights within bankruptcy proceedings. This case underscores the complexities of intellectual property (IP) management when a company faces financial distress. Legal professionals are now more acutely aware of the potential implications for athletes and celebrities whose…
The recent legal victory by Paramount Pictures over Netflix highlights the significant role of antitrust considerations in media industry deals. This case involved a contentious dispute over licensing rights, where Paramount emerged successful, reinforcing the necessity of adherence to antitrust regulations in protecting competitive market practices. Bloomberg Law provides insights into how this decision underscores…