In a recent development, the Federal Circuit has revived false advertising claims against Crocs Inc. The allegations stem from a competitor’s accusation that Crocs falsely promoted its footwear as being crafted from “patented, proprietary, and exclusive” materials. The decision reawakens legal proceedings questioning the veracity of Crocs’ marketing assertions. For more details, visit the full…
In the evolving landscape of the U.S. Supreme Court bar, a new wave of attorneys is emerging as formidable forces. Highlighted in recent coverage, these legal professionals are distinguished by noteworthy accomplishments and unique attributes. One attorney, for instance, boasts an impeccable record, having not lost a single Supreme Court case or even a single…
A legal dispute has emerged in a New Jersey federal court where a group of AIG insurers has accused an insurance startup of misappropriating trade secrets. The insurers claim that the competitor has weakened its own position in seeking dismissal by referencing a case that, according to AIG, fails to effectively counter the precedents they…
In recent legal proceedings, a Stanford oncology professor has publicly denied allegations of trade secret theft levied by subsidiaries of F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG. The accusations involve the alleged misappropriation of confidential data concerning cancer-detecting technology. In the California federal court, the professor asserted that the so-called trade secrets were not actually secret and contended…
Two Chinese nationals residing in Maryland have been sentenced to prison for orchestrating a scheme that defrauded Apple out of $2.5 million. The convicted individuals submitted over 6,000 counterfeit iPhones to the company, persuading it to exchange the fakes for authentic devices. This elaborate scam underscores the ongoing challenges faced by corporations in tackling counterfeit…
A Connecticut federal judge has approved an agreement by the American branch of global security firm Prosegur to erase data from its systems that was potentially uploaded by a newly appointed senior vice president. This executive, recruited from a competitor, is alleged to have brought with him information expected to impact $85 million in existing…
FisherBroyles, a prominent law firm, faces legal challenges in the form of a malpractice lawsuit initiated by its client, California Stem Cell Treatment Center Inc. The lawsuit, filed in the California Superior Court in Los Angeles County, alleges that the firm and one of its partners, Rob Phillips, committed professional negligence in their management of…
The ongoing efforts to resolve a $2.78 billion antitrust settlement concerning the NCAA’s rules on name, image, and likeness (NIL) compensation have encountered new challenges. Recently, a group of athletes has emerged in opposition to the settlement, criticizing its terms as “illusory, contradictory and overreaching.” This development adds another layer of complexity to the already…
This week has seen significant developments in insurance litigation. In Colorado, employees are now able to seek coverage that extends beyond traditional workers’ compensation following workplace accidents. This offers potentially expanded protections for workers involved in on-the-job crashes. Meanwhile, a longstanding legal dispute over the failure of a tunnel-boring machine has concluded, marking the end…
Brad Scheller, a partner at Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC, showcases a unique blend of professional excellence and artistic flair. Beyond his significant role in the legal sector, Scheller is actively involved in the New York music scene, performing with five different bands. These commitments see him playing over 50 shows annually,…
The issue of inflated patent infringement damages is increasingly prominent in legal discussions, as highlighted by William Lee at WilmerHale and Mark Lemley at Stanford Law School. They suggest that the key to addressing this issue lies in returning to a focus on apportionment in patent litigation. The failure to properly apply apportionment has led…
The United States and France have decided to extend their collaborative Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) agreement for an additional five years. This agreement facilitates the expedited examination of patents in one country that have already been approved in the other. The continued partnership aims to streamline patent processes, ensuring quicker and more efficient handling for…
The practice of law often involves keen observation, empathy, creativity, and cultural awareness—skills that attorney Michael McCready suggests can be enhanced through art collecting. In a recent discussion on his unique hobby, McCready explores the therapeutic aspects of appreciating and collecting art, illustrating how it contributes to his legal practice. His insights form part of…
Amazon.com and Canon have jointly filed a trademark lawsuit targeting counterfeit products sold online, a case first reported by Law.com Radar, a platform providing swift notifications on newly filed cases in various courts. This collaborative legal initiative reflects the ongoing battle major corporations face in protecting their intellectual property in the digital landscape. Counterfeiting remains…
Kirkland & Ellis LLP has recently lodged a complaint with a California federal magistrate judge, asserting that a former intellectual property associate is obstructing the discovery process in her discrimination lawsuit against the firm. According to Kirkland, the ex-associate’s discovery responses are inadequate, citing an incorrect legal standard and showing a non-committal attitude that is…
Kirkland & Ellis LLP has asserted that a former intellectual property associate is responsible for undue delays in the discovery process of her discrimination lawsuit against the firm. Addressing a California federal magistrate judge, Kirkland claimed that the former associate’s responses to discovery requests presented an incorrect legal standard, lacked commitment, and were “not even…
In a significant development in the ongoing legal battle between Sonos Inc. and Google, a California federal judge dismissed the remaining patent infringement claims asserted by Google. The case centered around allegations of unauthorized use of wireless technology in Sonos speakers. The judge ruled against Google’s position, determining that the claims lacked substantial evidence supporting…
In a renewed legal challenge, Sensory Inc. has filed a complaint against Google, asserting that the tech giant is illegally maintaining its monopolistic stance in the realms of search and advertising. The crux of the allegation lies in Google’s purported strategy to sideline competing voice assistant products by restricting their functionality on Android and other…
The evolving landscape of generative AI is increasingly reshaping the legal field, with technologies like GPT tools playing a pivotal role. These innovations, which range from advanced text predictors to art generation tools, are not merely technological phenomena but also legal game changers. Corporate legal teams and firms across the globe are grappling with the…
In a legal development involving a significant pharmaceutical entity, Delaware’s Supreme Court has appointed a Superior Court judge to the role of vice chancellor in a case concerning a Dubai-headquartered bio-pharmaceutical company. The legal proceedings revolve around the company’s accumulation of approximately $600,000 in sanctions, calculated at $3,000 per day, due to its failure to…
Avadel Pharmaceuticals has appealed to the Federal Circuit, arguing that a Delaware federal court exceeded its authority by preventing the company from testing its narcolepsy drug intended for treating a rare sleep disorder. Avadel contends that the court’s decision to block the testing was based on an alleged patent infringement concerning a similar drug from…
In the latest development spotlighted by Above the Law, a Biglaw firm has introduced a substantial new partner class, raising questions around how many of these newly minted partners might be receiving equity stakes. This move reflects broader industry trends of expanding partnerships which, nonetheless, prompt inquiries into the equitable share distribution among partners. On…
Amarin Pharma Inc., a pharmaceutical company known for its cardiovascular drug Vascepa, has defended a Federal Circuit decision that rejuvenates its patent case involving “skinny labels” against a competing U.K. drugmaker. The term “skinny label” refers to drug labeling that omits certain uses that are still protected by patents. This legal strategy allows generic drugmakers…
In a recent legal development, a federal judge in New York sided against the company behind the well-known Kerrygold butter brand. They were unable to persuade the court that consumer confusion existed between their product and a smaller, emerging Irish butter brand. The judge’s ruling highlighted that the packaging of the two brands was “markedly…
An unfolding patent dispute has surfaced in Colorado, where an Australian company is pursuing legal action against the kin of its technology’s originator. The company claims that the inventor’s sons are marketing sweepers in the United States that infringe on its mechanical sweeper system patently designed for cleaning sports fields. The complaint, lodged in a…