In a high-profile lawsuit, Doosan Bobcat has filed a case against Caterpillar Inc., alleging that the construction equipment giant has engaged in reverse engineering of their products, particularly focusing on skid-steer loaders, excavators, and dozers. The complaints have been filed in both Texas federal court and the U.S. International Trade Commission. According to the claims,…
DLA Piper LLP has reinforced its Washington, D.C. office by welcoming a seasoned legal professional with extensive expertise in national security reviews of foreign investments. The law firm announced that the experienced leader, formerly with the U.S. Commerce Department, is joining them as a partner. The new partner brings over a decade of experience in…
The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has ruled that China-based chipmaker Innoscience Technology infringed on one of two patents held by Infineon Technologies. The decision, delivered by an ITC judge, marks a significant development in the ongoing patent dispute between the two companies. Infineon’s patent concerns its semiconductor technology, a critical component in various electronic…
The ongoing legal battle over tariff refunds has intensified as a pivotal court decision looms, attracting the attention of major corporations and legal experts. At the heart of this matter is the potential reimbursement of tariffs imposed during the previous administration that many businesses argue were unjustly levied. Key stakeholders are closely monitoring the developments,…
Costco Wholesale Corp. has taken a significant legal step by joining a cohort of companies seeking refunds on duty payments if the U.S. tariffs imposed during Donald Trump’s presidency are repealed. This legal action reflects broader dissatisfaction among American businesses with the economic fallout from the tariffs implemented on goods imported from China. The lawsuit,…
The ongoing legal battle surrounding Netlist’s accusation against Google and Samsung has taken a significant turn with the involvement of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the Department of Justice’s Antitrust Division. Both entities have stepped forward to advise the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) on the parameters of exclusion orders in the…
Honeywell International Inc. has recently encountered a significant legal setback as the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) has effectively reversed its previous decision regarding tariff classifications. This reversal subjects Honeywell to 7% duties on a range of its imports, a development that comes after the CIT granted the government’s motion for a rehearing. The…
This week in corporate law, several key developments are capturing the attention of general counsels and legal professionals across the corporate landscape. These updates span regulatory changes, strategic decisions by major corporations, and significant legal outcomes that may influence corporate compliance and governance strategies. One of the significant highlights involves recent shifts in the regulatory…
Amidst ongoing uncertainty surrounding the tech industry’s regulatory landscape, companies are being advised to meticulously keep their receipts in anticipation of possible tariff refunds. The advice follows recent signals that anticipated semiconductor tariffs may be delayed, offering a potential financial reprieve for firms that have been grappling with fluctuating economic policies under the Trump administration….
The protracted legal battle between Apple Inc. and Masimo Corporation over smartwatch patents has intensified, culminating in a significant jury verdict and ongoing regulatory scrutiny. On November 14, 2025, a federal jury in California determined that Apple must pay Masimo $634 million for infringing a patent related to blood-oxygen monitoring technology. The jury found that…
Samsung Display Co. Ltd., a key player in the global display manufacturing industry, recently reached an accord with BOE Technology Group Co. Ltd. at the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC). This agreement resolves Samsung’s allegations that BOE improperly accessed and utilized its proprietary trade secrets related to smartphone and tablet display screens. These allegations, if…
In a significant move within the home appliance industry, Whirlpool Corp. has taken legal action against major competitors, including Samsung, LG, and Haier, urging the U.S. International Trade Commission to block imports of specific microwave models. The American appliance giant alleges that these brands have infringed on several of its patents related to its combination…
An Omani screw manufacturer has initiated a legal malpractice lawsuit against Perkins Coie LLP in Washington state court, alleging that the law firm’s representation during a U.S. Department of Commerce investigation led to significant financial losses. The company claims that a series of critical errors by Perkins Coie resulted in substantial penalties and tariffs, costing…
The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has announced its intention to review whether the redesigned versions of Apple’s popular smartwatch infringe on patents held by the medical technology company Masimo. This scrutiny comes in the wake of a previous order that briefly halted the import of Apple Watches, which were found to infringe on Masimo’s…
In a notable move, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Director John Squires has issued a directive to Yangtze Memory Technologies Co. Ltd. (YMTC), demanding they justify their legal challenge to Micron Technology Inc. patents amidst national security concerns. This development follows ongoing tensions between U.S. and Chinese tech companies, particularly in the chip manufacturing sector…
The outcome of a Supreme Court decision could compel the United States to issue refunds totaling up to $1 trillion to companies that paid tariffs under policies enacted during Donald Trump’s presidency. As reported by The Atlantic, if the Court rules against Trump, tens of billions of dollars in import duties might need to be…
The Indian snack food company Haldiram’s has recently secured a federal court order temporarily halting a food supplier in Washington state from importing or distributing its branded products. The action arises from allegations that the supplier illicitly repackaged and sold products not intended for the U.S. market. This legal maneuver highlights a growing issue surrounding…
A recent ruling by Administrative Law Judge Cameron Elliot at the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has put a spotlight on the complexities law firms face when navigating conflicts of interest during Section 337 investigations. The decision, which forms part of the investigation in Certain Active Electrical Cables and Components, warns legal counsel about the…
The intricate dance between Big Tech and former President Trump has raised significant concerns over its potential impacts on the broader economy. As major technology companies navigate political landscapes to maintain favorable positions, these relationships might lead to unintended economic consequences. This sentiment resonates with the viewpoint of Daniel Farber, a Berkeley Law professor, who…
In a session filled with judicial scrutiny, several U.S. Supreme Court justices expressed doubts about the legality of the emergency tariffs imposed by former President Donald Trump. The case, which could redefine the balance of power between the executive branch and Congress over trade policies, saw justices questioning the administration’s broad interpretation of its powers….
In a recent legal development, Altria Group and its subsidiary NJOY have challenged the process by which the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) appoints its administrative law judges, labeling it unconstitutional. This move is part of an effort to halt an ongoing ITC patent infringement proceeding that targets them. Their arguments were presented last Friday…
The U.S. Supreme Court’s recent session on tariffs has drawn considerable attention as it delved deeply into questions surrounding the constitutionality and implications of tariff impositions. Among the key issues is the extent of presidential authority under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, which allows the president to impose tariffs for national…
The U.S. Supreme Court has captured attention with several high-stakes cases, including the ongoing examination of the administration’s authority to set passport sex designations for transgender and nonbinary individuals. In a recent decision, the court sided with the Trump administration, temporarily upholding passport policies based on birth sex, as detailed in a brief opinion. In…
In a pivotal maneuver, Crocs has implored the Federal Circuit to overturn a decision by the International Trade Commission (ITC) regarding the importation of clogs that allegedly mimic its distinctive footwear design. The Colorado-based company argues that the ITC’s refusal to impose a ban on the imports was flawed, particularly in its assessment of Crocs’…
The recent ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court against the continuation of certain tariffs imposed during the Trump administration could have complex repercussions, particularly in the form of potential refunds. Legal experts and corporate entities are now navigating the implications of possible reimbursements resulting from these tariffs, as discussed in a detailed analysis by Bloomberg…