Law Firms Increasingly Prioritize National Security Expertise Amid Geopolitical Tensions

As global economic and political landscapes become increasingly complex, law firms are rapidly recognizing the critical importance of national security expertise. This shift is influencing recruitment priorities in major law firms, where professionals with national security skills have become highly sought-after assets. National security law, traditionally associated with government agencies, now commands significant attention from…

Read More

Altria’s Legal Challenge Against ITC Puts Focus on Patent Dispute Jurisdiction Limits

Altria Group Inc. has brought a constitutional challenge against the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) before the Fourth Circuit, arguing that the agency lacks the authority to resolve private patent disputes and to restrict the importation and sale of products allegedly infringing on patents. This legal maneuver comes in response to a patent case initiated…

Read More

Court Upholds Trump’s Authority to End De Minimis Tariff Exemption Amidst National Emergency

The US Court of International Trade recently issued a pivotal summary judgment supporting the Trump administration’s authority to rescind the de minimis tariff exemption for imports valued under $800. The court’s decision came in response to litigation initiated by Detroit Axle, a US auto parts dealer, which challenged the closure of a tariff loophole under…

Read More

Juul’s Patent Battle with Altria Reignites as ITC Reverses Ruling, Impacting Vaping Industry Dynamics

The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has taken a significant step in the ongoing legal battle between Juul and Altria by vacating an administrative law judge’s prior ruling that had deemed a Juul patent invalid. This decision effectively revives Juul’s case against Altria’s NJOY, creating renewed legal tensions in the competitive vaping industry. The ITC’s…

Read More

ITC Asserts Jurisdiction in Baby Carrier Dispute, Highlights Challenges in Parallel Legal Proceedings

The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has urged an Idaho federal court to dismiss a request from a baby carrier manufacturer seeking to compel a rival to withdraw its concurrent ITC complaint. The move underscores the ITC’s stance on maintaining its jurisdiction over such disputes and highlights the complexity of navigating parallel proceedings in different…

Read More

Netlist Files Patent Infringement Complaint Against Micron and HPE in ITC Showdown

In a notable move in the intellectual property landscape, Netlist Inc. has filed a fresh complaint with the U.S. International Trade Commission against Micron Technology, Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE), and two other companies, asserting that their imports infringe on several memory patents. This action follows closely on the heels of a substantial licensing agreement reached…

Read More

White House Deploys AI to Curb Tariff Evasion and Bolster Customs Enforcement

The White House is intensifying its efforts to combat tariff evasion, particularly through transshipment, with the implementation of a novel artificial intelligence tool. This initiative arose after identifying more than 40 countries involved in the suspicious rerouting of goods that likely originate in China. Transshipment, an illegal practice where goods are redirected through intermediate countries…

Read More

U.S. ITC Judge Rules Asus Infringes on Netgear Patents, Highlighting Patent Disputes in Tech Industry

In a notable decision by the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC), an administrative law judge has ruled that Asus, a prominent Taiwanese electronics firm, along with another Wi-Fi device seller, has infringed upon patents held by Netgear. This initial finding highlights ongoing tensions in the technology sector, particularly concerning patent rights and intellectual property disputes….

Read More

Importers Turn to Legal Action Over Denied Tariff Refunds: Surge in Lawsuits Highlights Trade Challenges

In recent months, importers have been increasingly turning to litigation as a means to challenge denied tariff refunds, a trend that reflects growing frustration with the complexities of U.S. trade regulations. Plaintiffs in these lawsuits are primarily focused on securing what they argue are rightful reimbursements, which have been delayed or denied due to administrative…

Read More

U.S. Court Orders $100 Billion Tariff Refund Amid Legal Challenges to Trump-Era Trade Policies

“`html The U.S. Court of International Trade filing revealed that approximately $100 billion of collected tariff revenue has been refunded by the Trump administration. This substantial figure represents about 60% of the total $166 billion collected from the tariffs imposed in 2025. The refunded amount marks a significant development in the ongoing legal and trade…

Read More

Foley & Lardner Strengthens International Arbitration Team with New Partner Clyde Beharry

Foley & Lardner LLP has expanded its international arbitration team by appointing a new partner, Clyde Beharry. Beharry brings significant experience in international disputes, having previously worked on cases involving complex arbitration across various sectors. His expertise is expected to bolster Foley & Lardner’s capabilities in handling cross-border arbitration matters. Clyde Beharry joins Foley &…

Read More

Andrew Todres of Ropes & Gray Named to Bloomberg Law’s Prestigious “40 Under 40” List for Legal Acumen in Finance Law

Andrew Todres, a standout attorney at the prestigious law firm Ropes & Gray, has been recognized as one of Bloomberg Law’s “40 Under 40” for his significant contributions to the legal profession. This recognition highlights Todres’s expertise and growing influence in the field of finance law, where he has been instrumental in guiding clients through…

Read More

Washington Court Upholds Attorney-Client Privilege, Impacting Legal Malpractice Case Against Ashurst Perkins Coie

In a recent ruling by a Washington court, Ashurst Perkins Coie has successfully resisted a demand to produce documents linked to its predecessor’s legal work involving an Omani nail manufacturer. The firm had been implicated in a legal *malpractice suit* concerning its participation in international trade proceedings. The court’s decision has significant implications for legal…

Read More

States Challenge Trump’s Global Tariffs: Legal Battle Over Trade Powers Intensifies

A coalition of 25 states, predominantly led by Democratic governors, has initiated a legal challenge against the Trump administration’s attempts to enforce extensive global tariffs. This lawsuit, filed in the International Trade Court, contests the tariffs as being arbitrary and not in accordance with the laws governing their imposition. The contested tariffs are linked to…

Read More

Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe Enhances IP Litigation Team with Washington D.C. Partner’s Return

Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP has announced the return of a former intellectual property litigation partner to its Washington, D.C., office, three years after his departure to White & Case LLP. This strategic move underscores Orrick’s commitment to bolstering its IP litigation capabilities in the nation’s capital. The returning partner brings a wealth of experience…

Read More

American Bar Association to Address Remote Work, Policing Reform, and AI Ethics at Upcoming Session

The American Bar Association’s House of Delegates is poised to tackle several important issues at its upcoming session, drawing the attention of legal professionals across the country. With the potential to shape both professional practice and public policy, the resolutions on the docket could have significant implications for lawyers and their clients. Among the most…

Read More

U.S. Customs Announces New Tariff Classifications Affecting Pharmaceutical Imports

In a recent announcement, the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) detailed new tariff classifications that will impact the pharmaceutical industry significantly. Beginning Friday, pharmaceutical companies will not face immediate tariff rates up to 100% on certain imported patented drugs and ingredients. However, the new regulations require importers to begin classifying their goods in preparation…

Read More

U.S. International Trade Commission Dismisses BMW Patent Case, Emphasizing Forum-Selection Clause Significance

In a groundbreaking decision, a U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) judge terminated a contested Section 337 investigation involving Zync and BMW, citing a forum-selection clause that required litigation to occur in Munich. This marks the first known instance in which such a procedural tool has been the basis for dismissing a Section 337 investigation at…

Read More

International Trade Ruling Reinforces Significance of Forum Selection Clauses in Global Contracts

A recent decision by a U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) judge has highlighted the crucial role of forum selection clauses in international trade litigation. The judge determined to terminate an investigation into BMW’s importation of infotainment screens following allegations of trade secret misappropriation by a California-based technology firm. The investigation’s collapse was primarily due to…

Read More

Arnold & Porter Enhances IP Practice with Key Hire from King & Spalding to Navigate Complex Cross-Border Disputes

Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP has bolstered its intellectual property practice by bringing on a seasoned attorney from King & Spalding LLP. Based in Washington, D.C., the new hire specializes in handling complex cross-border technology and life sciences disputes. This strategic move reflects Arnold & Porter’s ongoing commitment to enhancing its capabilities in international…

Read More