Navigating Corporate Fraud: The HealthSun Declination and Benefits of Voluntary Self-Disclosure

In the face of potential legal turmoil, corporates often wrestle with the dilemma – Should a company self-disclose major instances of fraud? The recent HealthSun declination provides a strong response: yes. Upon self-analysis, if your company realizes that it has overcharged the government upwards of $50 million, and the deception was orchestrated by a senior…

Read More

Bankruptcy Mediation Revisited: Corporation Seeks Fair Terms Amid Judge’s Undisclosed Relationship

A bankrupt prison healthcare corporation, name undisclosed, has recently announced its intentions to revisit and redo a mediation process that had previously resulted in an agreement with creditors. This reevaluation comes following an unexpected twist in the legal process: the presiding bankruptcy judge admitted to a romantic relationship with an attorney participating in the negotiations….

Read More

Mediation: A Viable Solution for Resolving Complex Corporate Disputes Involving Officers and Directors

Corporate dispute resolution often represents an intricate layer of the legal landscape. Conflicts involving a company’s top brass—its directors and officers—can add further levels of complexity. Primarily, these complications arise due to the nature of the claims, more often, derivative claims brought on behalf of the corporation or Limited Liability Company(LLC). Ostensibly, the corporation seems…

Read More

EPA Considers Additional PFAS Examinations and Remediation for Previously Cleaned Sites

In a significant development, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) could mandate additional examinations and clean-ups related to Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) at properties that were already considered remediated. This information comes from a conversation between Sarah Mattalian, an Inside EPA reporter, and an EPA official, highlighting the agency’s deepening commitment to managing the…

Read More

Tri-Seal Compliance Note: Crucial Guidance on Voluntary Self-Disclosure Policies

On the 26th of July, 2023, a significant legal communication was issued by three key United States government bodies; the Department of Justice (DOJ), the Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS), and the Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC). These departments collectively released a Tri-Seal Compliance Note titled:…

Read More

Navigating the Complex Landscape of PFAS Groundwater Regulations: A Challenge for Businesses and Legal Professionals

As international regulatory bodies continue to grapple with the complexities of managing per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in groundwater, one thing is clear – a consistent approach is far from realized. State-level agencies across the United States, facing a void of federal guidance on PFAS remediation, have started implementing their own objectives. This situation has…

Read More

Environmental Law Expert Scott Watson Joins Barnes & Thornburg as Partner in Grand Rapids Office

In a recent move, Scott Watson has transitioned into a partner position at the environmental department of Barnes & Thornburg in the Grand Rapids, Michigan office. Watson possesses significant expertise in advising clients on various facets of regulatory and litigation issues that concern both federal and state environmental laws. His professional repertoire includes dealings with…

Read More

Supreme Court Tackles Contaminated Soil Discovery in Construction: Implications for Contractual and Environmental Law

In a recent development in the legal framework surrounding environmental concerns, the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York took up a significant case dealing with issues arising out of a sewer contractor’s discovery of contaminated soil during the installation of a box storm sewer. The case is Bedford-Carp Construction, Inc. v. Brooklyn Union…

Read More

DOJ Introduces M&A Safe Harbor Policy to Encourage Voluntary Disclosures of Criminal Misconduct

The Department of Justice (DOJ) is introducing a Mergers & Acquisitions Safe Harbor policy. Unveiled by Deputy Attorney General Lisa O. Monaco at a Society of Corporate Compliance and Ethics event on October 4th, the policy seeks to encourage proactive, voluntary disclosures of potential criminal misconduct by acquiring companies. Under the new policy, the DOJ…

Read More

DOJ Introduces M&A Safe Harbor Policy for Voluntary Self-Disclosure of Misconduct

On October 4, 2023, the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) declared a standardized approach for resolving voluntary self-disclosure (VSD) of misconduct found during the course of M&A due diligence. Touted as the Mergers & Acquisitions Safe Harbor Policy (M&A Safe Harbor), this initiative represents a significant development for companies navigating the intricate landscape of…

Read More

DOJ Introduces M&A Safe Harbor Policy Promoting Due Diligence and Self-Regulation

The United States Department of Justice (DOJ) has recently inaugurated a Mergers & Acquisitions Safe Harbor Policy targeted towards entities that voluntarily disclose criminal conduct discovered during the acquisition of another company. As reported by Dorsey & Whitney LLP on JD Supra, the new enforcement policy could potentially serve as an incentive for acquiring companies…

Read More

Expanding Consumer Power: Representative Actions for Redress Foster Ethical Business Practices

Since October 13, 2023, consumer associations have had a new tool at their disposal: representative actions for redress. This legal framework offers an alternative route for consumers to seek remediation from companies who fall short of their performance claims. More details are available in this report provided by Allen & Overy LLP, a renowned global…

Read More

DOJ Introduces M&A Safe Harbor Policy to Encourage Self-Disclosures and Compliance Alignment

On October 4, 2023, the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”) announced a new Mergers & Acquisitions (“M&A”) Safe Harbor Policy, with an aim to spur self-disclosures and provide more predictability for companies in the M&A arena. This policy recognizes the potential compliance benefits when a company with an effective compliance program acquires and constitutes a…

Read More

Successor Liability and Environmental Risks: Navigating Corporate Transactions

In the ever-evolving landscape of corporate law, environmental liabilities have emerged as a significant concern, made all the more pressing by escalating public awareness and increasing regulatory measures. A recent article posted on JD Supra delves into the concept of successor liability, particularly in relation to environmental cleanup costs. With the total worth of commercial…

Read More

DOJ’s Mergers & Acquisitions Safe Harbor Policy: Encouraging Corporate Transparency and Ethical Compliance

In recent developments this October, Lisa Monaco, the Deputy Attorney General, publicly shared insights about the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) newly implemented Mergers & Acquisitions Safe Harbor Policy during her remarks at the Society of Corporate Compliance and Ethics’ 22nd Annual Compliance & Ethics Institute. JD Supra reports on it more comprehensively. The new Safe…

Read More

Incentivizing Compliance: Albemarle Case Highlights New DOJ Enforcement Policy’s Benefits and Limitations

In January, the Department of Justice announced new revisions to its corporate enforcement policy related to voluntary self-disclosure, cooperation, and remediation. The goal of these revisions is to incentivize companies that discover misconduct within their ranks to engage proactively with law enforcement and reinforce their compliance programs. According to these policy revisions, prosecutors now have…

Read More

DOJ’s New M&A Safe Harbor Policy: Implications and Deadlines for Acquiring Companies

The Department of Justice (DOJ) has recently implemented a novel Mergers and Acquisitions (M&A) Safe Harbor Policy, which has clear-cut implications for both acquiring and acquired businesses in the M&A ecosystems. For acquiring companies, this policy essentially enforces a six-month window from the date of closing within which they are expected to disclose misconduct discovered…

Read More

New Jersey’s Judicial Vacancies Spiral, Prompting Increased Dependence on Mediation

In the State of New Jersey, specifically in Bergen County, a rising issue of judicial vacancies is exacerbating the already strained judiciary system, prompting an increased reliance on mediations. Occupying a quarter of all trial court judgeships, current vacancies have bred not only escalating frustration among litigators, but also reluctant praise for the remaining judges…

Read More

DOJ Announces Safe Harbor Policy to Encourage Transparency in Mergers and Acquisitions

The US Department of Justice (DOJ) has made a noteworthy policy announcement targeting corporations that are participating in mergers and acquisitions. At the heart of this policy is a plan to reward corporations with robust due diligence and compliance programs. Promoting proactive legal action, the DOJ has created a “safe harbor” period. Under this policy,…

Read More