Litigation Surge Offers Growth Potential for Mid-Sized Law Firms Amid Shifting Legal Priorities

In recent years, litigation has emerged from the shadow of corporate law, presenting significant growth opportunities for law firms, particularly mid-sized ones operating outside major financial centers like New York City. This shift reflects a broader trend where clients increasingly prioritize litigation services, offering firms a chance to distinguish themselves in a competitive legal market….

Read More

Patent Litigation Evolution: Reviving 18th-Century Chancery Law to Reassess Injunctions

In a notable development within patent litigation, a Dallas-based attorney is advocating for the application of 18th-century English chancery law to facilitate the granting of injunctions for certain patent holders. This approach seeks to challenge the precedent set by the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2006 decision in *eBay Inc. v. MercExchange, L.L.C.*, which established a four-factor…

Read More

Assessing the Call for Reform in “Skinny Label” Patent Litigation: A Detailed Examination

In the recent discourse surrounding the legislative landscape of patent infringement, particularly concerning “skinny labels,” there appears to be a contentious debate on whether reform is truly necessary. The concept of “skinny labeling” allows generic drug manufacturers to produce FDA-approved drugs that only include non-patented uses, thereby avoiding patent infringement on specific patented indications ….

Read More

WilmerHale Expands Intellectual Property Practice with Strategic Hire of Adrian Percer in California

WilmerHale has announced the addition of Adrian Percer as a partner in its intellectual property practice based in Palo Alto, California. The legal powerhouse aims to bolster its expertise in key sectors with Percer’s inclusion. Percer is known for his adept handling of intellectual property matters, particularly for technology companies, and will be bringing his…

Read More

Thompson Hine Strengthens IP Litigation Team with Rachael Rodman as New Partner in Columbus

Thompson Hine LLP has announced the addition of Rachael Rodman as a partner within their business litigation practice group and intellectual property (IP) & technology litigation sub-group in Columbus, Ohio. Rodman brings a wealth of experience in managing complex legal matters, particularly in the realms of patents, trademarks, copyrights, and trade secrets. Her considerable expertise…

Read More

Clark Hill Strengthens IP Practice with Addition of Patent Expert Andrew Schwaab in Arizona Office

In a strategic move aimed at bolstering its intellectual property capabilities, Clark Hill has announced the appointment of Andrew Schwaab as a partner in its Scottsdale, Arizona office. Schwaab brings extensive experience in global patent prosecution, litigation, licensing, and the monetization of cutting-edge technologies. His appointment is part of Clark Hill’s broader push to strengthen…

Read More

Federal Circuit Clarifies IPR Estoppel in Ingenico v. IOENGINE, Signaling Strategic Shifts in Patent Litigation

In an intriguing development for patent litigation, a recent ruling by the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in the case of Ingenico Inc. v. IOENGINE, LLC, has clarified the reach of IPR estoppel, casting a spotlight on potential shifts in legal strategy for parties embroiled in patent disputes. The court’s decision…

Read More

Rising PTAB Petition Denials Emphasize Strategic Timing and Preparedness in Patent Litigation

In the aftermath of the March 24 guidance regarding Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) procedures, there has been a notable increase in the number of PTAB petition denials. This development followed the guidance centering on the application of the patent-owner favorable decision in Apple v. Fintiv. The ruling essentially allows PTAB judges and the…

Read More

Navigating Patent Challenges in AI: Insights from Recentive Analytics v. Fox

The legal landscape for patenting artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning algorithms has shifted notably in recent years, yet many questions remain unanswered regarding what constitutes a patent-eligible improvement in these areas. This gap was highlighted in the recent decision by the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Recentive Analytics v. Fox,…

Read More

Finnegan Appoints Veteran Trial Lawyer James Barney as Managing Partner Amid Strategic Global Expansions

In a strategic move, Finnegan, one of the leading global law firms specializing in intellectual property, has announced the appointment of James Barney as its new managing partner. Bringing nearly 25 years of trial experience, Barney notably represented Toyota Motor Corp. in numerous patent infringement disputes, positioning him as an influential figure in patent litigation….

Read More

“Robert Van Nest: Mastery in Trial Litigation Yields Victory in Billion-Dollar Google Patent Case”

Robert Van Nest, a distinguished partner at Keker, Van Nest & Peters in San Francisco, has been recognized in Bloomberg Law’s Unrivaled 2025 for his exemplary work in trial litigation. His most prominent recent success involved the defense of Google in a high-stakes patent infringement lawsuit against Singular Computing. Overseeing a legal team, Van Nest…

Read More

Samsung Prevails in $12 Billion Patent Litigation as Jury Rejects Infringement Claims

In a significant legal victory, Kirkland & Ellis attorneys Adam Alper and Michael De Vries successfully defended Samsung Electronics and its manufacturer, Applied Materials, in one of the most substantial patent infringement cases in recent history. The case involved allegations by Demaray LLC, claiming that Samsung infringed on two semiconductor patents via Applied Materials’ physical…

Read More

Bloomberg Law’s 2025 Unrivaled Lists Top Trial Lawyers in Key Litigation Battles

In a distinguished unveiling, Bloomberg Law has introduced its 2025 Unrivaled, showcasing 32 exemplary trial lawyers who have demonstrated outstanding performance in high-stakes litigation. These distinguished professionals, drawn from both prestigious large firms and specialized boutique practices, have secured significant victories in jury and bench trials, post-trial proceedings, and settlements. The honorees include skilled litigators…

Read More

Brian Rosenthal of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher: A Trailblazer in Patent Litigation Recognized in Bloomberg Law’s Unrivaled 2025 List

Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher’s Brian Rosenthal is prominently featured in Bloomberg Law’s Unrivaled 2025 list, recognized for his significant achievements in high-stakes patent litigation. One case that set Rosenthal apart was his defense of Cisco Systems Inc. against Corrigent Corp. in a $350 million damages claim. Notably, he successfully argued for the dismissal of three…

Read More

Recognizing Excellence: Reichman and Lehman Shine on 2025 Unrivaled List with Landmark Patent Victory

In the highly competitive arena of legal practice, Courtland Reichman and Christine Lehman, from Reichman Jorgensen Lehman & Feldberg, stand out as honorees in the 2025 Unrivaled list. Their recognition follows noteworthy achievements, including a significant victory for Kove IO in its patent infringement case against Amazon Web Services (AWS). The case, concluded in April…

Read More

David Berl’s Strategic Mastery in Patent Litigation: A Case Study of Regeneron vs. Mylan

David Berl, a partner and Co-Chair of Patent Litigation at Williams & Connolly, continues to make waves in the legal field with his notable work, including his successful representation of Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc. in a high-stakes patent case. The Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. case stands out as a significant feat, underscoring Berl’s…

Read More

Legal Luminary Tom Melsheimer: Guiding Flyp to Victory in Patent Dispute with Google

The legal spotlight shines brightly on Tom Melsheimer of Winston & Strawn LLP, acknowledged in the Unrivaled 2025 series for his distinguished contributions to trial litigation, including the high-profile case of Flypsi Inc. v. Google LLC. As Partner and Co-Chair of Global Litigation at Winston & Strawn, Melsheimer expertly navigated the complexities of this patent…

Read More

Ron Machen’s Strategic Defense: A Legal Triumph in Gilead Sciences vs. DOJ Case

In the legal landscape of 2025, Ron Machen of WilmerHale has made significant headlines with his exemplary defense strategies in high-stakes litigation. His notable achievement in the recent patent infringement dispute between Gilead Sciences and the US Department of Justice exemplifies his strategic acumen. The case revolved around Gilead’s HIV prevention treatments, Truvada and Descovy,…

Read More

Greenberg Traurig Strengthens IP Litigation Team with Patrick Michael’s Strategic Appointment in San Francisco

Greenberg Traurig has announced the recruitment of Patrick Michael as a shareholder in its intellectual property litigation practice, based in San Francisco. The addition of Michael, who specializes in cases involving patent infringement, trade secrets, and software copyrights, is expected to bolster the firm’s capabilities in handling complex IP disputes. Michael transitions from his previous…

Read More

Challenges at the US Patent Office: Balancing Innovation, Quality, and Public Interest

Recent analysis spotlights the ongoing challenges faced by the US Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) in its mission to balance innovation and public interest. According to a report by the Government Accountability Office (GAO), inefficiencies in the PTO’s patent examination process emphasize output over quality, which over time, may lead to stifled innovation and increased…

Read More