The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit recently delivered a significant ruling affirming that Niantic, the creator of the popular augmented reality games Pokémon Go and Harry Potter: Wizards Unite, did not infringe upon patents claimed by a company founded by biotech billionaire Patrick Soon-Shiong. The court maintained that the patents in question…
The Federal Circuit has decided not to rehear a pivotal case concerning Sony’s PlayStation controllers, effectively ending a legal battle over a claimed $500 million in damages. The patent dispute centered on allegations that Sony’s controllers infringed upon a computer input device patent. However, the court previously ruled in favor of Sony, finding no infringement…
In a recent decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has ordered a New York federal court to revisit a lawsuit alleging that Google and YouTube’s Content ID system infringes on a patent held by a licensing company. The ruling, issued on April 23, 2026, also affirmed the lower court’s invalidation of…
In a significant development in the ongoing patent litigation between Headwater Research LLC and Verizon Communications Inc., a Texas federal judge has ruled that Headwater cannot enforce two of its patents against Verizon due to a six-year delay in filing the lawsuit. This decision comes less than a year after a jury awarded Headwater $175…
The recent ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Willis Electric Co. Ltd. v. Polygroup Ltd. offers significant insights into the complexities of patent litigation, particularly pertaining to obviousness and damages. This verdict not only reaffirmed the validity of a single dependent claim but also upheld a substantial $42 million…
JAMS, a prominent provider of alternative dispute resolution services, has announced the addition of a retired judge from the Eastern District of Virginia, often referred to as the “Rocket Docket,” to its Washington, D.C., Resolution Center. Known for its swift handling of cases, the Eastern District of Virginia boasts a reputation for expedited judicial processes,…
Trulieve Inc., a prominent player in the cannabis industry, is embroiled in a legal battle as it contests a rival company’s patent infringement claims. This dispute has moved to a Florida federal court, where Trulieve has urged dismissal on the grounds that the complaint is devoid of factual substantiation for the alleged infringement. According to…
Norton Rose Fulbright, a prominent global law firm, is facing a $100 million lawsuit filed in Illinois state court by an advertising technology company. The company alleges that the law firm mishandled a vital patent application, leading to a significant loss of patent rights. The suit asserts that the firm’s actions resulted in the application…
The Federal Circuit on Wednesday denied Sarepta Therapeutics Inc.’s petition for a rehearing regarding a panel decision that reinstated a gene therapy patent held by the University of Pennsylvania. This patent is notably licensed by Regenxbio Inc., highlighting ongoing complexities in biotechnology patent disputes. The decision marks another chapter in the evolving landscape of gene…
RJ Reynolds Vapor Co., the company behind Vuse e-cigarettes, has initiated legal action in a Delaware federal court aiming to assert that its products do not infringe on a patent owned by competitor VPR Brands. The legal filing seeks a declaratory judgment, a proactive step in anticipation of potential intellectual property disputes that could impact…
A recent decision by a California federal court has largely upheld a lawsuit filed by Eli Lilly against a telehealth company over the compounding of its popular weight loss drugs, Mounjaro and Zepbound. While the majority of the case remains intact, the court did agree to dismiss a portion related to conspiracy claims. Eli Lilly’s…
Oura Health, a prominent Finnish company known for its smart rings that track various health metrics, has been targeted with a patent infringement lawsuit filed by Zepp Health in the Eastern District of Texas. This lawsuit forms part of a broader ongoing legal battle between the two companies over patents concerning wearable fitness technology. The…
Norton Rose Fulbright is embroiled in a significant legal challenge as an advertising technology company has filed a $100 million lawsuit in Illinois state court. The allegation centers on the assertion that the law firm mismanaged a crucial patent application, ultimately resulting in its withdrawal. More troubling is the claim that Norton Rose kept the…
Norton Rose Fulbright is currently embroiled in legal proceedings after being hit with a $100 million lawsuit stemming from an alleged mishandling of a patent application. The claim was initiated by a technology company, which accuses the global law firm of negligence leading to the denial of a vital patent by the U.S. Patent and…
In today’s complex landscape of intellectual property law, the life sciences sector faces unique challenges, especially concerning patent standing issues. The recent discourse examines these intricate elements, focusing on how mid-litigation transfers of patent ownership can affect legal standing and, subsequently, the potential for damages. Patent standing determines who is legally entitled to assert patent…
In recent trends, legislative focus in the United States has increasingly skewed towards copyright issues rather than patents. According to a comprehensive report analyzing Congressional activities related to intellectual property, there have been significantly more bills introduced that favor the strengthening of copyright laws compared to those addressing patent legislation as noted in a Law360…
U.S. District Judge Alan Albright, a prominent figure in the Western District of Texas known for attracting patent litigation, is stepping down from his judicial duties in August. This decision marks a significant transition for the Waco Division, which has become a hotspot for patent cases under his tenure. Judge Albright, a former magistrate judge…
In a recent announcement that could significantly impact the framework of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Director John Squires hinted at a forthcoming “comprehensive decision” regarding the discretionary factors used in reviewing PTAB challenges. The Director emphasized the importance of achieving “predictability” in PTAB proceedings to ensure clarity…
In a significant shift within the Western District of Texas, U.S. District Judge Alan Albright has announced his resignation, effective this summer, according to an update confirmed on April 21, 2026. Albright, who joined the bench in 2018, has garnered attention for his handling of numerous intellectual property cases, with the Waco division becoming a…
In a significant development for the Western District of Texas (WDTX), U.S. District Judge Alan Albright has announced his resignation, confirmed earlier today. Albright, who has been a central figure in handling patent litigation since his appointment in 2018, will be stepping down at the end of this summer. Over his nearly eight-year tenure, Albright…
Pfizer and its Israeli counterpart, Dexcel Pharma Technologies, have agreed to remove two patents from an impending bench trial related to a generic version of a heart medication. The decision comes just a week before the trial was set to commence, reflecting ongoing patent litigation dynamics within the pharmaceutical industry. The agreement signifies a strategic…
In recent discussions at the Federal Circuit, the contentious topic of means-plus-function claims in patent law has resurfaced, sparking renewed interest in their viability and applicability. Originally perceived as dwindling in effectiveness, these claims remain a fascinating component of patent jurisprudence. According to recent insights from current cases, the expected demise of such claims appears…
In a significant decision, the Federal Circuit has upheld the disqualification of Banner Witcoff and Saiber from participating in a patent ownership dispute. The ruling came after a district judge’s decision to remove the firms due to a perceived conflict of interest, a move that was contested but ultimately reaffirmed on appeal. The court indicated…
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has upheld a decision by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) that invalidated two semiconductor chip patents in a case involving Micron Technology Inc. The ruling effectively ends efforts to revive these patents in a lawsuit that accused Micron of infringement in the District of…
In a significant development affecting the food delivery sector, Domino’s, Pizza Hut, and various other companies have been targeted by a lawsuit in a Texas federal court. The suit alleges infringement on five patents concerning technology for mobile ordering and payments. This legal action underscores the growing importance of technological innovation and the complexities surrounding…