Amway Challenges Jurisdiction in Trademark Infringement Case with Begin Health Inc.

Amway Corp., a prominent multi-level marketing company, is seeking dismissal from a trademark infringement lawsuit filed by Begin Health Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina. The case, initiated on December 22, 2025, under docket number 7:2025cv01608, alleges that Amway’s product branding infringes upon Begin Health’s trademarks. Amway contends…

Read More

Federal Circuit’s Deliberation on Amazon AI Patent Case Poses Crucial Test for Future of AI Innovations

The Federal Circuit recently examined a challenge concerning the patent eligibility of an artificial intelligence-related invention in a case involving Amazon. The dispute centers around Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute’s claim that their patent was improperly invalidated as abstract. This case highlights ongoing tensions in determining the boundaries of patentability for AI innovations, a burgeoning field that…

Read More

Google Faces Lawsuit Over Alleged Trademark Infringement of “Gemini” AI Services

Google is facing legal challenges with a new lawsuit filed in Florida federal court, accusing the tech giant of trademark infringement related to its “Gemini” artificial intelligence services. According to the complaint, Google’s expansion into the consumer electronics market with its AI-powered speaker systems is infringing on a decades-old trademark. The company, which initially launched…

Read More

Colorado Jury Awards $200,000 in Landmark Cannabis Trademark Infringement Case

A jury in a Colorado federal court recently held two smoke shops accountable for trademark infringement, awarding $200,000 to a California-based bong maker. The case centered on the unauthorized use of a trademarked design—a gravity infuser bong—after a three-day trial that brought attention to issues of intellectual property within the rapidly expanding cannabis industry. The…

Read More

High-Profile Commercial Disputes in London Highlight Legal Challenges and Industry Trends

This week, London’s legal scene featured several high-profile cases, showcasing a wide range of commercial disputes. Among them, the litigation between the insolvent solar bonds company Rockfire Capital and the Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS) drew considerable attention. Rockfire Capital has taken legal action against RBS, asserting that the bank played a role in the…

Read More

Appeals Court Evaluates Trademark Dispute Over Phrase Linked to U.S. Army Usage

The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals is currently deliberating on whether to grant a California-based T-shirt company a retrial in a trademark dispute concerning its use of the phrase “This We’ll Defend” on its products. The court is examining whether this phrase, traditionally associated with the U.S. Army, is sufficiently distinctive to warrant trademark protection…

Read More

USPTO’s Proposed Rule on Foreign Patent Representation Sparks Debate Among Legal Experts

In recent developments, a trade group representing intellectual property owners is seeking clarity regarding the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s (USPTO) proposed rule requiring all foreign patent owners to be represented by a domestic-registered patent practitioner. This proposal, which has generated significant discussion among legal professionals, aims to streamline the patent application process by ensuring…

Read More

USPTO Ruling Reverses Patent Review as Revvo Technologies’ Challenge Fails Again

In a significant decision for intellectual property law, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) Director John Squires has once again dismissed Revvo Technologies’ request for a review of a patent held by Cerebrum Sensor Technologies Inc. The patent in question involves advanced tire sensor technology, which Revvo Technologies has contested through the USPTO’s Patent Trial…

Read More

USPTO Narrows Patent Challenges: A Reflection on Rigorous Patent Oversight and Innovation Strategy

In a crucial decision impacting patent litigation, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) Director John Squires recently instituted four new patent challenges under the America Invents Act while denying 25 others. This decision, reported on Law360, reflects the ongoing scrutiny and selectivity in the patent review process. The America Invents Act, enacted in 2011, introduced…

Read More

Impending Overhaul in Global Patent and Trademark Regulations Set to Transform IP Strategies by 2026

The realm of intellectual property law is poised for significant transformation as policymakers begin implementing shifts in patent and trademark regulations in 2026. These changes are set to influence the way corporations and law firms approach their IP strategies, demanding a keen adaptability to remain competitive. Among the pivotal developments, the attenuation of patent holder…

Read More

Trademark Board Rules in Favor of “Danke” Chocolates, Citing Distinctiveness from “Merci”

In a decision that establishes a precedent in trademark law, the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) ruled that the proposed trademark for “Danke” chocolates does not infringe upon the existing registration of “Merci” chocolates. The board concluded that despite both words translating to “thank you” in different languages, they are not confusingly similar enough…

Read More

California Judge Questions Jurisdiction in Perplexity AI Trademark Dispute

In a significant development in the ongoing trademark dispute involving Perplexity AI, a California federal judge has requested the AI startup to substantiate the court’s jurisdiction to cancel a trademark held by a similarly named entity. The question arose after a default judgment—a consequence of the opposing party’s inability to secure legal representation—was vacated. This…

Read More

Federal Circuit Upholds USPTO’s Discretion in Patent Review Challenge by Google

The Federal Circuit recently dismissed Google’s challenge against the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) regarding its practice of denying patent reviews based on the “settled expectations” of patent holders. This decision marks a continuation of failed attempts to contest the agency’s evolving policies concerning the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) processes. The implications…

Read More

Hunter’s Solicitors LLP Challenges Confusion Claims in Trademark Dispute with Hunters Law LLP

In a recent legal development, Hunter’s Solicitors LLP has addressed claims of confusion with Hunters Law LLP, asserting that any misconceptions are “trivial, rare, and legally insignificant” (Law360). This statement came in response to concerns that the similarity in the firms’ names might mislead clients into mistaking one for the other. The debate around these…

Read More

U.S. Federal Circuit Affirms USPTO’s Discretion in Patent Review Proceedings, Reshaping Litigation Strategies

In 2025, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued several decisions that underscored the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s (USPTO) broad discretion in managing inter partes review (IPR) proceedings, highlighting ongoing tensions between the judiciary and the patent office. In November 2025, the Federal Circuit denied Motorola Solutions’ petition for mandamus…

Read More

Supreme Court to Clarify Immigration Powers in Landmark Case on Green Card Holder Deportations

The United States Supreme Court is poised to address a pivotal matter pertaining to the powers of immigration officials. The court has agreed to consider a case questioning whether immigration agents can base decisions on criminal charges alone when assessing whether lawful permanent residents (LPRs) should be considered removable. The case, Bondi v. Lau, will…

Read More

Matthew McConaughey’s Trademark Bid Highlights Legal Challenges in the AI Era

Matthew McConaughey’s recent trademark filing has sparked discussions about its efficacy in addressing the growing challenge of artificial intelligence (AI) imitating celebrity voices. The actor’s application to trademark his iconic catchphrase “Alright, Alright, Alright” is seen as an attempt to protect his brand identity from unauthorized AI-generated imitations. This move highlights a significant concern for…

Read More

Virginia Judge Upholds USPTO’s Rejection of La Jolla Pharma’s Patent Applications in Industry Defining Decision

In a significant decision, a Virginia federal judge upheld the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s (USPTO) refusal of La Jolla Pharma LLC’s patent applications. These applications pertained to a unique dosage and delivery method for a drug aimed at treating low blood pressure. The judge ruled that the claims put forward by La Jolla Pharma…

Read More

Federal Circuit Upholds Prosecution Laches Doctrine in Key Patent Law Decision

The Federal Circuit has denied a petition filed by prolific inventor Gilbert Hyatt to reconsider its position on the doctrine of prosecution laches. This legal doctrine can render a patent unenforceable when the patent owner has excessively delayed during the application process, potentially disadvantaging competitors. Hyatt’s petition appealed for the abolition of prosecution laches, arguing…

Read More

USPTO Extends Patent Prosecution Highway to 2029, Enhancing Global Cooperation and Efficiency

The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has announced the extension of the Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) collaborative program with four major international intellectual property offices through 2029. This initiative aims to expedite the examination process for patent applications that have already been granted in one of the participating countries, thereby enhancing efficiency and promoting…

Read More