Tesla’s Supreme Court Challenge: A Pivotal Moment for U.S. Patent Review Dynamics

In a significant move that underscores ongoing tensions over patent law, Tesla Inc. has petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court, criticizing the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s (USPTO) limitations on patent reviews. Tesla contests that the USPTO’s actions are significantly undermining the review framework established under the America Invents Act. The company contends that these constraints…

Read More

New Acting Commissioner for U.S. Patents Appointed, Signaling Shifts in Intellectual Property Strategy

In a recent development at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, a former principal shareholder at Greenberg Traurig LLP has been named acting commissioner for patents. This appointment marks a significant transition within the agency, particularly as it addresses an evolving landscape in intellectual property law. According to the appointee’s LinkedIn profile, this new role…

Read More

Anne Mendez Appointed Acting Deputy Director of USPTO Amidst Technological Innovation Push

The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has announced Anne Mendez as the new acting deputy director following the departure of Deputy Director Coke Morgan Stewart to the private sector. Mendez’s appointment underscores her long-standing commitment and experience within the agency she has served for many years. Her extensive knowledge of both patent and trademark…

Read More

Toothpaste Trademark Showdown: GSK and Retailer Clash Over Brand Similarities

In a recent development, a personal care retailer has refuted claims by GSK, the makers of Sensodyne and Aquafresh, over allegations that its “Sensio” and “Triple Protect” toothpaste brands infringe on GSK’s trademarks. The controversy centers around the potential for consumer confusion, though the retailer argues that the distinctive nature of its packaging and design…

Read More

Supreme Court Case on Trademark Strength Could Transform Corporate Branding and Legal Strategies

The recent decision by the U.S. Supreme Court to hear RiseandShine Corp. v. PepsiCo Inc. marks a pivotal moment in trademark litigation, particularly regarding the determination of brand strength. As companies across various sectors await the implications of this case, the central issue revolves around whether a judge or a jury should decide the robustness…

Read More

U.S. Supreme Court May Reexamine “Settled Expectations” in Patent Review Challenge by Kahoot

The legal landscape surrounding patent reviews may soon be under the spotlight of the U.S. Supreme Court as Kahoot Inc., an e-learning company, challenges the established practices of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). At the heart of Kahoot’s petition is the USPTO’s use of “settled expectations” as a basis to deny patent reviews,…

Read More

OpenAI Settles Trademark Dispute with IYO, Emphasizing Importance of Branding in Tech Industry

OpenAI has reached a settlement with startup IYO over a trademark dispute involving the use of the “IO” name for artificial intelligence hardware. This resolution follows legal proceedings that saw both companies assert their intellectual property rights in a California federal court. The dispute centered on the potential consumer confusion arising from both entities utilizing…

Read More

Federal Judge Advances Danone’s Trademark Infringement Case Against Chobani Over “Bright & Mellow” Branding

A New York federal judge has allowed Danone’s trademark infringement suit against Chobani to proceed, marking a significant development in the ongoing legal battle over the use of the phrase “Bright & Mellow” in coffee-related products. Danone claims the phrase is part of its brand identity, while Chobani contended it was too generic to be…

Read More

USPTO Deputy Director Katherine Stewart Transitions to Private Sector, Highlighting Public-Private Leadership Dynamics

Katherine Stewart is set to leave her position as Deputy Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) this week to take on a new role in the private sector. Stewart’s departure comes after a tenure marked by significant contributions to the agency’s modernization efforts. Joining the USPTO in 2020, Stewart played a…

Read More

Connecticut Courts Tackle Age Discrimination, Food Safety, and Wine Trademark Cases in 2026 Legal Showdown

In mid-2026, Connecticut courts have become the focal point of significant cases, including a crucial one involving the state’s primary hospital group. This case questions whether the enforcement of mandatory cognitive tests for healthcare providers over age 70 is a violation of federal disability and age discrimination laws. Legal professionals are closely monitoring the proceedings…

Read More

Navigating Patent Eligibility Challenges for Machine Learning Innovations in the U.S.

The landscape of patent eligibility for machine learning (ML) technologies has become increasingly complex due to divergent interpretations by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. This discord presents significant challenges for innovators seeking to protect their ML inventions. In April 2025, the Federal Circuit…

Read More

Trademark Dispute Unfolds: Sensodyne and Aquafresh Sue Retailer Over Confusing Product Names

In a recent legal development, the companies responsible for household toothpaste brands Sensodyne and Aquafresh have initiated a lawsuit against a beauty and personal care retailer. The action alleges that the retailer’s “Sensio” toothpaste range and “Triple Protect” oral care products could potentially mislead consumers into confusing these products with the well-established brands. This legal…

Read More

Ohio Patent Attorney Challenges USPTO Over Alleged Bias in Disciplinary Proceedings

An Ohio patent attorney has filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), asserting that its attorney disciplinary procedures operate under an unlawful “pay for play” system. This accusation highlights potential biases within the USPTO’s framework, allegedly disadvantaging legal professionals facing disciplinary actions as reported by Law360. The attorney contends that the…

Read More

Ohio Attorney Challenges USPTO’s Disciplinary Practices, Alleging Bias and Pay-for-Play System

An Ohio patent attorney has initiated legal action against the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), alleging that the office’s disciplinary procedures are fundamentally flawed. The attorney argues that the system operates under a “pay for play” scheme, which he claims leads to biased outcomes against those facing disciplinary charges. This lawsuit raises important questions…

Read More

Attorney Files Lawsuit Challenging USPTO’s Disciplinary Procedures, Citing Lack of Fairness and Transparency

An attorney has initiated legal action against the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), challenging the agency’s handling of disciplinary procedures. The lawyer argues that the current method lacks fairness and transparency, which could have broader implications for attorneys across various legal fields. The lawsuit highlights concerns regarding how disciplinary cases are managed by the…

Read More

Laura Ganoza’s Advocacy in Trademark Case Highlights Evolving Legal Dynamics in Hospitality Industry

Laura Ganoza, a seasoned partner at Foley & Lardner LLP, has earned recognition for her robust advocacy in a trademark infringement lawsuit involving a resort’s brand identity. Her approach was highlighted by opposing counsel Sarah Ring from Porter Hedges LLP, who acknowledged Ganoza as “a strong advocate” in the proceedings. This case underscores Ganoza’s reputation…

Read More

USPTO Director to Revisit PTAB Ruling, Potentially Redefining Patent Dispute Landscape

In a recent development within the intellectual property landscape, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Director John Squires announced plans to revisit a Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) decision from two years prior. The original ruling invalidated claims from an EagleView Technologies patent related to roof measurement technology. This move to reassess the PTAB’s decision…

Read More

Connecticut Court Ruling Highlights Trademark Resolution in Pest Control Industry

In a legal resolution that underscores the importance of trademark clarity in advertising, a Connecticut federal court has approved a consent judgment favoring a New York exterminator in their dispute over the use of the term “black widow” for pest control services. The settlement follows a contentious trademark confrontation between the unnamed New York exterminator…

Read More

PTAB Affirmance Rates on Patent Eligibility See Decline Under New USPTO Leadership: Implications for Innovation and Law

Recent data analysis has revealed a slight decline in the affirmance rate of patent eligibility decisions by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), correlating with the tenure of the current U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Director, John Squires. The analysis, conducted by McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP, highlights that since Squires took over…

Read More

USPTO Launches Pilot Programs to Streamline Patent Applications and Boost Semiconductor Innovation

The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has introduced several pilot programs aimed at enhancing the patent examination process. These initiatives offer both opportunities and challenges for applicants and legal practitioners. One such initiative is the Pre-Prosecution Pilot Program, launched in December 2023. This program assists first-time inventors by providing preliminary assessments of potential…

Read More