In a recent lawsuit, Thomson Reuters presented an argument against ROSS Intelligence’s antitrust counterclaims, stating that there’s no evidence to imply any user of legal research has combined alternative platforms. The legal tech giant further alleges that ROSS Intelligence inappropriately used its Westlaw platform in order to develop a new product.
The ongoing argument between Thomson Reuters and ROSS Intelligence presents a compelling case within the legal tech industry. The dispute focuses heavily on the interaction and potential overlap between differing legal research platforms, implying that the results of this case could have broad implications for how users and companies approach multi-platform research in the future.
According to Law360 report, Thomson Reuters’ contention that there’s no evidence of mixed use of legal research platforms forms the backbone of their defence strategy against ROSS Intelligence.
Legal professionals in high-level corporations and large law firms are keenly observing the developments in this lawsuit. The outcome of this argument between two tech giants is not just crucial for determining the rules of fair play in the legal tech industry, but it also indicates how the community is expected to navigate the increasing push for multi-platform compatibility and use.