When presenting witness testimony in trials and depositions, the nuances of language can significantly impact the credibility and effectiveness of the testimony. Attorneys play a crucial role in ensuring their witnesses are well-versed in responding appropriately to the words used by the opposing counsel. Selectively choosing ‘good’ testimony words could both enhance the credibility of the witness and improve the chances of success in court. Words such as “always” and “must” can often present issues, leaving witnesses open to manipulation, whereas words like “potentially” and “depends” offer opportunity for measured and guarded response.
This view is shared by legal experts Steve Wood and Bill Kanasky from Courtroom Sciences, who emphasize the importance of education in assisting witnesses to understand how their language in court can ultimately interpret their honesty and accuracy. However, the specific considerations can be complex, and it’s advised that legal professionals consistently update their strategies in witness preparation.
More details on this topic and the guided description by Wood and Kanasky can be found in their recent Law360 article. The article provides insight into teaching witnesses about ‘good’ and ‘bad’ testimony words, and the difference it can make in court proceedings.
These little complexities remind us that law is indeed a field where every word carries weight and requires careful consideration.