In an ongoing disbarment trial, the attorney for John Eastman, confronted a potential setback on Wednesday. The presiding judge initially refused to introduce an expert report challenging the outcomes of the 2020 presidential election as evidence. However, she later expressed a willingness to reconsider this matter in further discussions.
The report in question has been looked upon as pivotal in Eastman’s case. The submission of this document into evidence could potentially question the validity of the election results, providing possible grounds of argument for Eastman’s legal team.
You can keep track of this unfolding legal event and its potential implications on similar cases by following up with updates on Law360.