The owner of four patents relating to the image transfer on fabric has put forth an argument before the U.S. Supreme Court, contending these were improperly deemed void following a challenge spearheaded by Avery Dennison among others. The pivotal grievance routed in their claim is that the decision to invalidate the patents did not sufficiently illustrate why the fusion of prior inventions made the patents apparent.
This most recent development follows a legal challenge in which the validity of the patents was contested primarily on the grounds of alleged obviousness due to the combination of earlier inventions. It is claimed that the evidential base supporting the ruling of patent invalidity lacks substantial depth of explanation, thus raising questions about the entire process.
The original article can be read on Law360.