Data analytics company Teradata has petitioned the Ninth Circuit to review and ideally revive its trade secret and tying allegations against software giant SAP, on the grounds that an earlier court ruling wrongly discounted testimony from its expert economist. The previous case also allegedly misconstrued agreements of confidentiality that were put in place when the two corporations tried to partner.
This is the latest development in the lengthy legal battle between Teradata and SAP, characterized by accusations of antitrust violations and intellectual property (IP) claims. According to Teradata, the lower court judge misunderstood and disregarded expert testimony and trivialized partnership agreements, actions that could have serious implications for similar cases in the future.
Teradata now hopes to find justice at the Ninth Circuit level, looking for relief from earlier adverse legal decisions. However, the outcome of the appeal brings implications not only for these two tech behemoths but potentially ripples beyond to the broader technology and legal sectors.
For a detailed reading of this ongoing legal encounter between Teradata and SAP, you can visit Law360.