In a recent twist in the copyright dispute involving Netflix’s acclaimed docuseries “Tiger King”, numerous filmmakers, authors, and law professors have called for the Tenth Circuit to reconsider its decision to breathe new life into a part of the copyright complaint against the streaming giant. These legal and creative professionals assert that the appeals panel erroneously interpreted the U.S. Supreme Court’s crucial Warhol decision while delivering their judgment against Netflix.
The Warhol decision referred to here marks a significant precedent set by the Supreme Court on matters relating to copyright obligations. This ruling and its misapplication by the Tenth Circuit, as proposed by the concerned parties, form the linchpin from which their argument extends.
In light of this, these constituents from the legal and creative industry have beseeched the Tenth Circuit to take another look at the partial revival of the copyright complaint against Netflix for its notorious “Tiger King” docuseries. The plea was based on the contentions that the court’s decision was improperly informed by an incorrect application of the precedent-setting Warhol ruling.
To delve into the detailed unfolding of how this has played out, consider consulting the original Law360 article.