In an attempt to challenge the constitutionality of Daniel’s Law, several companies have filed a motion to dismiss privacy suits brought under this legal provision, arguing that it violates the First Amendment and the New Jersey Free Speech Clause. According to the motion, the law, which is designed to protect the privacy of judges and other public officials, is excessively broad and prone to misuse. The companies argue that the statute imposes “liquidated damages” triggered by a short and arbitrary compliance deadline, without any consideration of fault or extenuating circumstances.
The motion was submitted in the U.S. District Court in Camden, New Jersey, emphasizing that Daniel’s Law undermines fundamental free speech protections. For further details, the original article in the New Jersey Law Journal provides additional insight into the ongoing legal proceedings and the companies’ arguments.